|
I am guessing that it uses the palm OS. If anyone knows the real answer let me know.
Pamela Reinskou
Some Days the Dragon Wins!!
VersusLaw Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
I still have my SonyEricsson T68i that replaced my Nokia 8850 when his screen stopped working. There was no phone that was worth throwing the T68i away, 'cos it has what i need in a small case ...
I don't think that I wan't to put a Palm on my ear?
Greets
Roland
Wenn der Computer wirklich alles kann, dann kann er mich mal kreuzweise.
(Manfred Schmidt)
Follow your Euro notes in their tracks
|
|
|
|
|
You can't answer the phone without putting your palm to your ear
T68i was nice - I think I upgraded from mine because of a faulty SIM Only thing wrong with them is slow reboot (eg: time til you could lookup items in directory)
--
Meski
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, sure you can. Bluetooth offerings include a Palm-free headset profile -- I mean hands-free. :->
Now, I don't know if the T68i has BT, but hey, I not serious anyway.
Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
|
I just *knew* I was going to get that reply. Anality is not dead.
--
Meski
|
|
|
|
|
My previous mobile phone was the T610 (with newset Firmware upgrade) + BT free spech mechanism and it worked perfectly!
Now I have a i-mate SP3i ...
Look at the +/- list (at the bottom of the page):
T610 compared with SP3i
Kind Regards, hfr
|
|
|
|
|
I am one of those starving developers who are unable to afford a cell/mobile phone. So I will have to live with my iPAQ and Samsung Cell Phone for now....
Works for I need it. The only disadvantage is that I have 2 devices instead of one... Some day I guess
|
|
|
|
|
My celular (mobile phone) use this tecnology to develop mobile application.
Alexsander "Axia" Antunes
|
|
|
|
|
I know one of the guys that develops "BREW" at Qualcomm. It is essentially some programming environment (From my understanding, I'm not really familar or into this type of stuff) for writing applications for mobile devices (or something or other), it's being developed by Qualcomm (you remember Eudora?).
You should be able to find more information here:
http://www.qualcomm.com/[^]
8bc7c0ec02c0e404c0cc0680f7018827ebee
|
|
|
|
|
It uses a proprietary C++ environment but the development kit is easily obtained and there's lots of info, etc. It is a worthy competitor to Java and MS environments, though it has some basic architectural and philosophical differences.
Peter Kryszak
|
|
|
|
|
It's just an API from Qualcomm. It's gain popularity pretty fast. I did an internship with a company last summer that makes the only email application on the brew platform.
/\ |_ E X E GG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats why they have off buttons :p my phone is Symbian, but it is a P800, so i use it more as a PDA
http://www.infinity.co.nr
http://www.casiofortissimo.co.nr
There are 10 types of people, those who can count in binary, and those who cant!
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote:
I have no cell phone, no pager, no nothing. I don't want to be reachable 24 hrs a day.
I only bought mine because I was spending more time on client's sites and needed to be contactable by other clients. I bought a 'pay as you go' phone with £10 credit. That was over 18 months ago and I still haven't used up the inital £10.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Why being reachable? Use it to make other people reachable
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm chronicaly disorganised, so having a decent calendaring and task organising application available at all times it useful. Also like to run the occaional emulator and read eBooks. Having a phone and paltop in one package was a natural next step for me.
So I got me one of these[^] Pocket PC phones. The fact that it has built in Wifi so I can use it as a skype handset around the house and in most of central Manchester is pretty nice too.
Ryan
|
|
|
|
|
You must have big pockets
8bc7c0ec02c0e404c0cc0680f7018827ebee
|
|
|
|
|
|
The UI is so sloooow
|
|
|
|
|
why is java really slow?
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe because it uses an interpreter?
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
|
|
|
|
|
interpreters are slower than compilers?
|
|
|
|
|
A compiler, interprets the whole program just once (on the developer machine) but an interpreter does it every time you run the program (on the client machine)... that's why its slower.
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
|
|
|
|
|
can some one plz mail me how java actually works?? or suggesting a site wud be better......
tq,
Tej...
000000000 TTTTTTTTTTT
0000000000000 TT
0000000000000 TT
0000000000000 TT
0000000000000 TT
0000000 EEEEEEEEE
0000000 EE
0000000 EE
0000000 EEEEEEEEEE
0000000 EE
0000000 EE
0000000 EEEEEEEEEE
0000000 JJJJJJJJJJ
0000000000 JJ
0000000000 JJ
0000000000 JJ
0000000000 JJ
0000000000 JJ
000000 JJJJJ
|
|
|
|
|
it's not so compilcated...
you have a code source (plain text) that you compile.
but the java compiler won't create an exe file that is the machine code for you processor.
it generates instead an intermediate language called Byte Code, and it is this byte code that is interpreted by the Java Virtual Machine to generate the appropriate assembly for you processor.
Of course, you will ask : "but, why do we need an intermediate if it becomes slower ?"
good question, but the answer is so pertinent :
"portability" !
effectively, the same program generated in byte code can run either on Windows (whatever plateform), MacOS, Linux, sunOS, etc... without recompiling !!! (the only condition is that a virtual machine must be running to execute a java program )
hope this help more now ...
cheers,
|
|
|
|