|
"You're conflating issues here: it's not "will" of the majority at all - it's a lot more like evolution where there is no directed result but a trend towards beneficial change."
i don't think that all nations should evolve in the same path. for me diversity is more beneficial, where one can compare and chose. the fact that until 1990 there was a capitalist, communist and a neutral block was, in my point of view, beneficial for all. a one world order that offers no alternative to compare is a dangerous path. the fact, that you cannot see in another countries an example of success or failure vs yours...
"remember that some evolutionary pathways are dead ends that largely die out!"
i remember the idians and the aborigine, but they didn't died on they own. they were destroyed by a race that forcefully suppressed their custom way of life and tried to educate them the "right way". we have lost many (now ancient) civilizations by spreading of "values" and we will lose even more if we manage to spread our "values" beyond this planet. woes those who will encounter our system of values, sometimes called christianity, sometimes called communism, sometimes called islam and sometimes called democracy... because we accept no alternative
"Better for work/life balance, better for the planet, better for corporate balance sheets. What's not to like?"
remember that if the human species dies it is better for the planet, too. alas, we don't know if the next civilization of cockroaches will be even more devastating for the environment
from what i can see, i know you meant well. i wanted to point out some bad examples.
never estimate that what is good for some people is good for all people. be careful with the "we" philosophy. "we" societies can take a bad turn and when they do, it can be very very dangerous for one's soul
cheers
|
|
|
|
|
i'm confused by this: doesn't the $ you spend on resources near your home somehow balance the $ you spend eating out at places near the office ? So, yes, the deli and whatever near the office close down, just as people moving to the burbs use malls rather than downtown stores, and the big downtown stores close.
cheers, bill
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
When I went to the office ( I stopped the year BEFORE COVID ) I never ever went out for lunch, unless it was a company paid lunch. Leftovers or peanut butter sandwich. It was both a cost and time savings strategy. Eat at your desk while you work and it truly is an 8 hour day.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
If work from home is not an option that tells me something about the employer.
And I wouldn't want to work for such an employer.
It also depends on where my office is located.
When it was a 100km+ drive I preferred WFH, but when it was 6km I was at the office every day (by bike).
It's currently 12km, used to take my bike, but been taking the car for months now
|
|
|
|
|
when cought in traffic jams or having family obligations working from home is a dream.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
KarstenK wrote: having family obligations working from home is a dream. as long as the kids are not at home, mind you...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It actually depends on the commute time
If I had a 15 minute bike ride, I'd probably go to the office almost every day. An hour car drive on the other hand ...
|
|
|
|
|
I am a software developer (who would have thought?) so I can do a lot from home, but the debug must be done in a laboratory with expensive instrumentation and bulky frames, plus a the selection of different models.
The bare minimum instrumentation I use costs upwards of 50k, requires more power to operate than what a home in Italy gets from the line (3.6 kW max for each home contract, 6 kW if you have an EV, pay a premium and your line supports it) and at 3-phase 380V to boot, which isn't available at all in homes.
When we get to thermal chambers, EMC rooms, anechoic chambers and load tests there is no way I can stay away from the lab proper.
That said there have been long stretches of time (months) where I worked exclusively from my office desk and could have debugged with less than 2k€ of instrumentation that would easily fit in place of my flight simulator joystick at home so...
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
wow ! sounds like you are testing nuclear fusion
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
If only! Working in such an environment has always been a starry-eyed dream for me, either chemical, physical or biological.
Alas I develop car parts, which are bulky, powerful and need to meet dozens of different safety and electrical regulations. Which is annoying but absolutely essential, all vehicle technology (from ancient carriages to trains and airplanes) is sadly built on a lot of accidents, most of them deadly.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Years ago, I worked in a US, EPA lab (Environmental Protection Agency). We tested car emissions using tons of expensive gas-analyzing gear. It was a lot of fun. My boss had apparently inhaled way too many car fumes, making him one of the first people to even think of the idea of working from home. He let us do design work one day a week at home. Very special circumstance.
Interesting aside: After about a month, I understood the readings from the gas-analyzing instruments. While we were doing a test run on a vehicle, one of the lab technicians pulled me aside and said, "hey, watch this!" He pointed to the active gauges and chart recorders, so I'd make a mental note of what the gas levels were running at. He pulled the "sniffer" out of the tail pipe of that running vehicle. (The sniffer is a small tube, placed inside the exhaust pipe, drawing the car's exhaust gasses into the instruments.) He took a cigarette pack out of his lab coat pocket, lit one up, and proceeded to exhale the cigarette smoke into the sniffer.
Many of the instruments pegged their meters! Meaning that exhaled cigarette smoke contains a higher concentration of hydrocarbon particulates, nitrogen oxide, and carbon monoxide than a few seconds of car exhaust does.
Moral of the story?
Next time you want to smoke, take a hit off of a car's exhaust instead.
Besides being able to work from home once a week, there was another fringe benefit of that job.
I quit smoking that very same week.
Universal Compiler Error 49: unrecognized developer. (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)gnore, or assume (F)etal position
|
|
|
|
|
Cosmic Turnip wrote: I quit smoking that very same week. That makes you smart
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I'm OK splitting my time between home and office
Office is OK, but I'd like to occasionally work from home
I prefer working in an office
Not necessarily in that order.
|
|
|
|
|