|
If reader is very much interested in the topic & has no or less information about the topic he/she will read enthusiasticly but if he knows something already he will only search for the new things/points in the article which he/she doesnt know.
Also, if an article possesses good technical points with some sample code , everyone will be interested to read...
|
|
|
|
|
it depends the article topic
|
|
|
|
|
|
i'd like to see all the requirements at the top of every article. system (if necessary), which .net, all software, langs, libs, etc., etc.. i hate getting part way through an article to discover i can't (or won't) use what i'm reading about.
|
|
|
|
|
"Browse Code"?
(Above "States". Above "Revulsions". Above "Alternators". Above "Concomitants".)
|
|
|
|
|
noop. not gonna browse the code to find out.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly; the reader shouldn't need to download the code just to find out it's filth.
It seems some authors just want to get those download-points though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Show me, Show me, Show me.
But don't say codez
|
|
|
|
|
Something good...
|
|
|
|
|
the ones that are inaccurate/written very poorly and written in a language I cannot read. Those are my favorite articles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How can you tell they're inaccurate/written very poorly, if they're written in a language you can't read?
Ah! I think I see the problem.
Google translate!
Damn you, google, for making good articles look bad!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
whenever I read any article on something new topic, me being a newbie cannot judge on the technical accuracy.
I assume that community has taken care of it and what I see is technically accurate.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I'm tired of 100001-th article, explaining for imbeciles "design patterns" or custom made "the best ORM". We need innovations, not a copy-pasta (even if it's written from scratch, it's always a copy of other's explanations).
And articles should have one more classification: 1) Student work to increase amount of publications (or fill up CV) 2) Normal, useful, interesting article.
|
|
|
|
|
Does it matter if it's a phony innovation?
An article is as good as it is read, understood and absorbed. Maybe there are 10000 articles about a subject, but only one really helps the community.
If it's innovative, it's even more awesome.
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
|
|
|
|
|
What's the Most Important Thing When Taking A Survey?
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
[.] Answers
[.] Questions
[.] Bacon
[.] CLstCtrl
[.] Other
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
That it either be multiple choice or not.
|
|
|
|
|
But not Boolean, obviously.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
XOR maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
The Topic, we choose to write/read an article is the main concern.
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
Hence the "Assuming you're reading an article you're interested in" in the explanation
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yes sir...
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
...will answer this poll "wrong" - at least for european minds, the "most important" point would be "1", not "5" as we always think in school grades when doing such surveys, where "1" (european pendant to the us "A" grade) is "best" and not "least".
I am happy, I read the explanation first, but intuitive, I'd given the "1" to the most important values.
|
|
|
|