|
Hi, sorry for the late reply. Version control systems are a pretty new thing for me; the link you sent has been really useful so thanks for that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use TFS 2013, has the web portal, and all the bells and whistles. Why Not!
|
|
|
|
|
I find tipping the bottle so it is vertical to the plate at 90 degrees until the sauce starts to run then bringing it back to a 45-35 degree angle so you control how much spills out onto the Bacon Sandwich is the best way.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course they all have they goods and bads but as long as the one you use suites your needs then I would probable recommend you to stick with it.
I Started with CVS then SourceSafe, TFS, SVN and now Git.
The only time I actually migrated from one to other was from SourceSafe to SVN after some commits disappeared.
Cheers!
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Finally I am in the majority this time!
|
|
|
|
|
Which I find shocking given how bad it is! Unfortunately I use in the office, but would choose Git every time
|
|
|
|
|
In terms of product acceptance alone, putting aside the attributes of either system, Git is a name that should never adorn a product. In the west it means "Go Away!".
Conversely, the name SubVersion is genius.
Git is a stupid mistake of a name. Whoever named it needs to get out more.
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently Linus Torvalds had that in mind when he named Git (although he implies a different meaning).
Torvalds has quipped about the name git, which is British English slang roughly equivalent to "unpleasant person". Torvalds said: "I'm an egotistical bastard, and I name all my projects after myself. First 'Linux', now 'git'." The man page describes git as "the stupid content tracker".
Wikipedia link[^]
I guess he doesn't get out much, what with all the OS development and whatever...
Personally I prefer Mercurial, though I seldom get to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitBucket isn't a source control system - it's hosting for a source control system. If you're using BitBucket then you're either using Git or Mercurial as your "source code control system".
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification.
I never used that.But I heard about that.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I was customized using SVN.
From this vote, I know many source control tool exists. Then what is the difference between those and which is the best?
|
|
|
|
|
Differences: see here.
The best: depends on project and team...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your kindly answer!
|
|
|
|
|
And we just upgraded to the 2005 version
|
|
|
|
|
You are not alone. Same here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same here[^].
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all of my projects, I use Git - mostly hosted on our Gitlab server.
However, being a Graduate student, I also have to work with code that is being submitted by students on class deadlines. Since it is possible -- in fact it's quite easy -- to change the date/time on a Git commit, we require student projects to be on the SVN server to ensure that timestamps are correct.
|
|
|
|