|
I had to hit reset to get out of it.
I still have trouble getting that un charming thing to even pop up.
|
|
|
|
|
alt + F4 works for my just fine
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: I had to search for 'Shutdown' button on the internet
I'm just glad you didn't find it... 
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
I think Microsoft has it right. For the Typical User, Windows RT will suffice. Once Microsoft ports Office to Touch applications, the desktop can and should go away.
For the professional user (programmers, artist/designers) their tool chain will take longer to move to the touch format...not sure if they should at all. So we'll need the desktop.
|
|
|
|
|
incipire wrote: For the professional user (programmers, artist/designers)
I would like to see a secretary typing all correspondance with the touchpad in office. It's the same with accounting.
Of course there are many problems that could be bettet solved with a good touch-application. Controlling has some of those problems in BI. Programmers could navigate through issues with that.
All "visual" problems could be quick solved with touch. All others not. 
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't say a tablet, I said windows RT. Windows RT doesn't preclude using a keyboard.
|
|
|
|
|
incipire wrote: I didn't say a tablet, I said windows RT. Windows RT doesn't preclude using a keyboard.
Did I? Nope.
|
|
|
|
|
however all so-called typical users, whom I know, hate that damn UI. Is it accidental?
|
|
|
|
|
That would be 5-10% of current users supporting desktop platform with the cost of such platform of $5000-10000 a piece. Win RT platform is closed platform with limitations on app design. It is not a good choice for average user because they still want 3rd party applications and interaction with other apps. That is not possible with closed software deployment model.
|
|
|
|
|
... and one that can go completely away. There was no reason not to leave the desktop UI completely intact, but no, Microsoft has to f*** with the Start button and create a presentation layer that for some reason also means you have to disable automatic updates in two places instead of one. WTF does the presentation layer have anything to do with the underlying OS behavior?
I hope that when Ballmer leaves, some semblance of intelligence will again grow back out of the primordial ooze that now seems to constitute Microsoft's collective "thinking."
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
you think that Metro Thing is just a visual overlay in Windows? It's not - there is a new API and the store thing... this explains also your "2 update disable" problem. What would you do instead of MS? Go with the API from 1986 forever and put another wrapper arround it, or just let the buissness users go with all there legacy in-house apps.? .. Ya' the start button - 
|
|
|
|
|
johannesnestler wrote: there is a new API and the store thing
People have been writing cool things for Windows for years. Windows survived all sorts of interesting things (like DirectX) without screwing up the desktop experience. There's nothing wrong with creating a new API. The store thing? It's an app!!! I can't imagine any reason something like that would require a new API.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Marc,
I agree with your comments on "cool things ... without screwing up Desktop". And I don't want to discuss if the new API and UI is "good". But It's a fact that there is a new API for WindowsStore Apps (and Windows RT for ARM based devices). Couldn't quickly find a "better" summary - but main points are touched:http://msmvps.com/blogs/burrows/archive/2012/05/05/windows-8-metro-and-winrt.aspx
So the "store thing" is not just the app.
Of course I understand that your perspective is valid for a "user-only" view to the topic, but here we are on a programmer platform, and from a programmers perspective I can "understand" MS decision for a new API with no legacy concerns. But the "force to new Metro UI" is for shure a marketing decision, and regarding this I think your critic is valid (there should have beeen some option "boot to Desktop and let me alone with your Metro UI and new application infrastructure" from the first Win8 version on).
Kind regards Johannes
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: So the "store thing" is not just the app.
...but it should be.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
hehe - good answer - and I have to agree...
|
|
|
|
|
It's funny...I heard the same whining and moaning when Windows moved from 3.x to Win95/NT4.0
In order to progress, something has to change.
|
|
|
|
|
incipire wrote: In order to progress, something has to change.
Progress and change are not synonymous. Frequently enough, they are orthogonal. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
All of my clients do business work on their PC. The so-called Metro interface is a hindrance to their getting actual work done. Accounting, scientific data acquisition and data processing, word processing, advanced graphics: none of these have any reason for a telephone+ interface or applets, etc. These users need the desktop and the Start Button and not touch or motion-detecting screen oriented interfaces. They use Metro-like on their phones and tablets, not the PC.
Charles Wolfe
C. Wolfe Software Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
"The hunter that chases two rabbits catches neither"
I remember it from playing Civilization IV years ago, now I understand the meaning! 
Seriously though, I can understand what's happening, I guess. It started over a decade ago with introduction of .net. At first it seemed like a framework, but reality is that it's way more. It's more like another OS inside Windows. It has it's own threading system, application domains and boundaries, file system APIS, memory management, graphics system, etc. Maybe it was so good and so successful that they decided to make it part of the operating system, not a layer on top and thus the new Runtime and new set of APIs.
I believe the problem started when they decided on hybrid OS wishing to get part of device market, dimming the light of the new nice platform they were creating for "developers"! At least this GUI does not seem like a good way of chasing two rabbits, if any GUI ever can do it. 
[Edit]
P.S. Nice job on the free 'Unit Testing Succinctly' book. I enjoyed reading it a few weeks ago. Thanks.
[/Edit]
Planning to move to Germany, looking for a job there!Looking for a Windows desktop programmer? I look forward to hearing from you!
|
|
|
|
|
Actually the new UI is entirely written in native code (C++) - it would be horrendously inefficient otherwise. There are managed APIs for programming it, but there are also C++ (COM) APIs.
I like this, I don't like the closed and controlling nature of the marketplace and I don't like the lack of start menu - but its easy enough to install a third party utility for this purpose.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Grainger wrote: new UI is entirely written in native code
Yes, that's my point. Am I missing something here? I was saying that with WindowsRuntime, MS is providing an equivalent of .net as native OS API.
[Edit]
Start menu is really not my concern either. There are bigger issues on desktop.
[/Edit]
Planning to move to Germany, looking for a job there!Looking for a Windows desktop programmer? I look forward to hearing from you!
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with the "controlling nature of the marketplace" comment. I see Metro as a copy of Apples locked down model. I enjoy the freedom of downloading whatever I want from where ever I want as well as offering my apps on what ever market I want, be it my own market or elsewhere(i.e my own website) without needing to code sign it or get it approved by anyone for posting.
|
|
|
|
|
Hamed Mosavi wrote: <layer>At first it seemed like a framework, but reality is that it's way more. It's more like another OS inside Windows.
And interestingly, there's Singularity[^], an experimental Microsoft project to create a managed OS. A quick google also revealed Cosmos[^], a CodePlex C# open source managed OS (hey, and OS managed OS!) that someone started.
Hamed Mosavi wrote: P.S. Nice job on the free 'Unit Testing Succinctly' book. I enjoyed reading it a few weeks ago. Thanks.
Thanks for the feedback!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Singularity
Interesting! Interesting name too. So the idea of mixing the two started long ago, although by reading part of Singularity project motivation, I'd say it aims very high, far from just an OS with well designed APIs.
You're welcome! Thank you for the effort of providing the book. Easy to read and to the point. I liked it.
Planning to move to Germany, looking for a job there!Looking for a Windows desktop programmer? I look forward to hearing from you!
|
|
|
|
|
Hear Hear
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
