|
Java is like my girlfriend,and database like my X..!! I love both.. :P
1010111011
|
|
|
|
|
At this point there are 27 votes for C# under Other. This puzzles me quite a bit as that category has been there for a long time.
To illustrate, here are links to the first and the last I could find.
Your favourite C# articles from October 2002[^]
Best C# article of April 2013[^]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Just to reiterate the percent of pointer haters, I suppose
Nuclear launch detected
|
|
|
|
|
Phyton <3
i love this lamguage..
Indonesia IT Intelijensi
Freedom of Revealing And Sharing Knowledge.
www.indonesiaitintelijensi.com
|
|
|
|
|
Wanna see only PHP!! Big fan of PHP!
|
|
|
|
|
Let's go extensible and embedded.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
PHP Article[^]
(I fully expect to get flamed by PHP advocates for this)
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
PHP, Ruby, etc. works well enough when you don't really know much about security or the difference between a few web pages and a real application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is so widely relevant to most business domains. I think it will get the most readers.
Also, it seems it is the most negelected aspect of technical learning in the industry.
(I find a lot more moments looking at database designs that I do when looking at code - probably because the DB is so much harder to refactor when it is live.)
|
|
|
|
|
Amen,
I have to deal with a DB (God thanks I have only to make data available, not mantain the DB). If you could see how it looks like...
I am trying to convince the customer to stop "adding" new features and start over again with a better structure.
Who said that dinosaurs are extincted?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have to agree and I have finally decided to vote for this category (yes, it took me the whole week to decide).
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Someone answered the same as mine.
(1) Misc
(1) Misc./Other for articles that does not fit in the other categories
thatrajaNobody remains a virgin, Life screws everyone
|
|
|
|
|
How about just plain C++, instead of C++/MFC? It's quite sad that an obsolete Microsoft framework from the 90's is paired with a great language like c++.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amen. I understand the historical reasons for that, but MFC really needs retirement from Code Project.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed - MFC's day in the sun is over. It had it's time to shine, and I used it a lot back then, but it's time to move forward.
I would prefer just plain C++/STL/Boost.
|
|
|
|
|
C++ yes
C++/STL/Boost no
--
Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
What on earth is wrong with STL?
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think he meant that there is something wrong about writing about STL, just that C++ should be enough ... then we can write about anything related to C++.
Personally I would prefer C/C++ ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
STL is part of Standard C++, so needs no special category.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Grainger wrote: What on earth is wrong with STL?
Nothing is wrong with STL but it doesn't need to be added to C++ as an extra qualification/niche. We don't need to have C++/MFC, C++/Boost, C++/ATL, C++/STL, C++/VS6 or even C++11. Just "C++" works fine.
And yeah, I know about C++/CLI.
--
Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
C++ goes to the same direction as MFC, so / is quite enough for this category name.
* Holy war expected
modified 28-May-13 2:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
Well actually there are still quite a few people who, like me, still have to deal with MFC a lot and I would certainly be lost without all the awesome MFC articles on Codeproject
I wouldn't mind a split of the two categories tough
|
|
|
|