|
吴高峰, 你在codeproject发表的文章排名很靠前啊,
YOU ARE NEVER TOO LATE TO ENJOY EVERYTHING.
|
|
|
|
|
|
for js, html and xul
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Did you happen to notice the survey title? Doh! back at ya.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
The world is changing from a Microsoft-Universum, to other targets. I ever programmed with VS but now, I write for browsers and maybe for android.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Read the survey question again. It says "Which versions of Visual Studio are you using?".
-Saurabh
|
|
|
|
|
The overwhelming majority (at 70%) right now said their using VS2008. Well VS 2010 is in its infancy. If I have to start new ASP.NET / C# project do you suggest I jump to VS 2010 or stick with 2008?
|
|
|
|
|
If u are a beginner VS 2010 is a good choice. there are more easier intellisense features and better syntax higlightning. If u already developed some projects and dont need this stuff, use 2008. its stable and u can build projects up to .NET 3.5.
In VS 2010 u can also build .NET Projects in .NET 2.0 up to 4.0.
|
|
|
|
|
tipsybroom wrote: use 2008. its stable
The hell you say. Try developing a wpf app in 2008. It's so unstable that it's almost funny.
Unfortunately, 2010 provides no tangible compelling reason to migrate to it.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am using 2010 and like it a lot. Unless you have to work on existing code use 2010
cheers,
Donsw
My Recent Article : CDC - Change Data Capture
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a small business owner and haven't been able to justify the cost of upgrading to VS2010. The only key improvment I've seen in terms of compiled code is multi threaded apps.
At this time, stability is my main interest. What does the upgrade offer in stability improvements?
The mind is like a parachute. It doesn’t work unless it’s open.
|
|
|
|
|
The Resource Compiler seems to be horrible broken; switched back several projects (targetting -.NET 2.0 ) from VS2010 to VS2008.
|
|
|
|
|
As an MFC / native C++ developer VS2010 offers me 2 great improvements versus prior versions:
- Parallel programming library and debugging support. At last multi-core/thread programming is 'do-able'.
- Visual ribbon developer. OK, you may not like the Office 2007+ ribbon but it's the current look and I want my software to look like Office.
Still a few performance issues on some of the new stuff which makes using them a drag. Had to renew my Visual AssistX, which does these things much better/faster etc. (as well as other lovely stuff) and now I'm happy again.
From my experience so far there is little reason NOT to go VS2010 across the board. (Unless you need to build for W2K. Native C++ compiled code does not run on W2K - not sure about others.)
|
|
|
|
|
peterboulton wrote: As an MFC / native C++ developer
What's the restored MFC Class Wizard like? Or were you one of those devs who never missed it?
Personally the last C++ I did was in VC++ 6 so I've never run into the IDE issues that C++ devs complained of from VS 2002 onwards.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Kevin,
I worked round no MFC Class Wizard in the versions between VC6 and VS2010 but it's nice to have it back!
Visually and functionally it is everything you would want or remember from VC6. I still use VC6 on one of my projects.
The only thing I would say about the VS2010 implementation is that it's a little slow coming up. On the same machine the VC6 class wizard appears instantly whereas it's a couple of seconds in VS2010. The 'same machine' is a quad-core, 3Gb, Win7 Pro 32bit.
This appears to apply for many of the VS2010 navigation type features - first time (especially) in a session they can be quite slow.
Pete
|
|
|
|
|
peterboulton wrote: I want my software to look like Office
You have drunk the koolaid!! Beware the Jabberwock!
|
|
|
|
|
Although I have VS2010 I am currently only *testing* it.
So far as I use any of the versions my mainstay is still VS2008.
Also, in the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" I still have stuff on VS2005 & VS2003.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Why do programmers often confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that Visual Studio 2010 is the best. But there is always something to improve. So let us look forward to the next. That's all folks.
|
|
|
|
|
Heribert Bennek wrote: But there is always something to improve. So let us look forward to the next.
the Microsoft sales department couldn't have said it better.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it's pretty but it's not perfect unfortunately.It behaves much more better VS2008 when working on HD or Full HD displays, but it still has some terrible problems - for example when you select any text in the IDE it starts
blinking (on my full HD display under Win 7) , which is awful reaction.
Life is a stage and we are all actors!
|
|
|
|
|
Very often this is controlled by the clients needs.
Some clients do not care what version of .Net they use-so long as their product works.
Others, however like to use the latest.
It's best to be prepared to use any of the last two or three releases of .Net.
My signature "sucks" today
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Studio 2010 has a better look, better stability, and less memory/CPU load than any previous version. Did I mention it's faster, too.
|
|
|
|
|
ericdecesare wrote: Visual Studio 2010 has a better look, better stability, and less memory/CPU load than any previous version. Did I mention it's faster, too.
And just because they thought this wouldn't be good enough for us, they even removed the documentation started to reimplement the help system but didn't get the job done in time and delivered a fully unusable documentation. Oh, and for those who know MSDN by heart, they still built in some nice random crashes when working with the WPF editor...
Let's not be that cynical, though; managed Intellisense is somewhat improved, though not in XAML, and the UI, which I don't really care for, is a bit more shiny, and... oh wait... that's cynical again. I still use VS2010 daily, though. Maybe that's the reason...
.NET 4, though, is a really, really nice step forward.
|
|
|
|
|
So far, so good, I use it for Winform, WPF, Silverlight and Data centric apps. It runs smooth....
Two heads are better than one.
|
|
|
|