Which design approach is best suited for this kind of problem

Question

0.00/5 (No votes)

See more:

Hi,
I am trying to come up with a solution for below problem and not sure how to approach it without making client depended on concrete classes. Problem statement is as below

"I have a list of a product say A,B,C,D. A has 3 property named x,y and z and 1 function F1. product B has 4 property named x,y,z and p and 2 function named F1 and F2 and so on for product C also has 4 property named x,y,z and p and 2 function named F1 and F3. and product D has has 4 property named x,y,z and p and 2 function named F1 and F4.

Now because of this i can not have a common interface or abstract classes because class B have one additional function and C and D have one function which is different than B and which is common.

Is there any possible solution using which i can avoid this ? Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.

What I have tried:

I thought of Having conman code in one abstract class and than creating concrete class with additional function which is contain the abstract class (as a dependency). But in that case my client will be forced to be depended on concrete class.

Posted 2-Jul-17 5:52am

CS2011

Updated 2-Jul-17 8:06am

Add a Solution

2 solutions

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

RickZeeland · Answer 1 · 2017-07-02T08:06:00

Solution 2

Maybe you can use a Dictionary similar to that in the answer to this StackOverflow question: reflection - C# Using Activator.CreateInstance - Stack Overflow[^]

Posted 2-Jul-17 8:06am

RickZeeland

pt1401 · Answer 2 · 2017-07-02T06:45:00

If I'm reading the pattern in the classes correctly, wouldn't something as simple as this do?
Or you could even pub p into a separate interface & inherit it in B,C,D...

C#

public interface IA
{
    int x { get; set; }
    int y { get; set; }
    int z { get; set; }
    int F1();
}

public interface IB
{
    int p { get; set; }
    int F2();
}

public interface IC
{
    int p { get; set; }
    int F3();
}

public interface ID
{
    int p { get; set; }
    int F4();
}

public class A : IA
{
    public int x { get; set; }
    public int y { get; set; }
    public int z { get; set; }

    public int F1()
    {
        return 0;
    }
}
public class B : IA, IB
{
    public int x { get; set; }
    public int y { get; set; }
    public int z { get; set; }
    public int p { get; set; }

    public int F1()
    {
        return 0;
    }
    public int F2()
    {
        return 0;
    }
}

public class C : IA, IC
{
    public int x { get; set; }
    public int y { get; set; }
    public int z { get; set; }
    public int p { get; set; }

    public int F1()
    {
        return 0;
    }
    public int F3()
    {
        return 0;
    }
}

public class D : IA, ID
{
    public int x { get; set; }
    public int y { get; set; }
    public int z { get; set; }
    public int p { get; set; }

    public int F1()
    {
        return 0;
    }
    public int F4()
    {
        return 0;
    }
}