|
The only programming language that has more implementations than users.
The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter
how many women are assigned.
|
|
|
|
|
However they are all nicely stacked.
|
|
|
|
|
And concatenated 
The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter
how many women are assigned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am new to Forth ... it seems that is has a long history, and there is even a .net implementation published on CP: Delta Forth .NET
|
|
|
|
|
Tachyonx wrote: there is even a .net implementation published on CP: Delta Forth .NET
Isn't that a First Person Shooter for LISP developers: Delta Forth[^] ?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If you play that you're thertain to develop a LITHP
|
|
|
|
|
Referring to your sig: According to the book, Forth is especially strong in selected areas of math - I read in the book "Go Forth, and multiply".
|
|
|
|
|
Member 7989122 wrote: I read in the book "Go Forth, and multiply"
The title should have been "gforth and multiply"
The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter
how many women are assigned.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't know that "Multiply" was a computer language!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
For sure it has power. I will root for it!
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
Uros Calakovic wrote: The only programming language that has more implementations than users.
Don't worry. Mickeysoft is catching up quickly with all the new versions and incarnations of the .Net framework. Compatibility at least never was Forth's big problem.
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
However, users never leave it: they just keep going back-and-forth...
(I'll get my coat)
|
|
|
|
|
Ah. The Hotel California of programming languages.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
What a nice surprise!
|
|
|
|
|
I remember look at some Forth code the guys were writing for an Atari 400/800 at the game company I was working at years ago. I was coding 6502 assembly for the C64 on a separate game. Forth seemed completely unintelligible. While my first "computer" was an HP calculator and I loved RPN, the programming (all 49 instruction spaces) was still linear. Funny that, now that I think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried for a while the Forth programming language on my ZX Spectrum, then I discarded it in favour of the Z80 assembly.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure HP calculators used RPN purely to prevent anyone borrowing them off you more than once... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That game seems oddly familiar... Memory is vague...
I did own a C64 back in the day though 
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I did own a C64 back in the day though
I didn't think you were that old! I wrote that back in 1982 or so. Sadly, HESWare folded right after (like within days) of it going to market. I eventually received a royalty check for a dollar and change. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm not THAT old actually, I'm from '87.
When I was about 6 years old I got an uncle's old C64 with a whole lot of floppy disks and I think your game was one of them.
What are the odds?
I remember my favorites were Donald Duck's Playground[^] and Robin of the Wood[^].
It didn't last very long as we got a Windows 95 computer when it came out.
And I occasionally played on my dad's DOS computer (Prince of Persia and Titus the Fox mostly), but not a lot since that was also his work computer.
Good old times
Since I've played your game once or twice I could give you another dollar to soften the pain 
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I got an uncle's old C64 with a whole lot of floppy disks and I think your game was one of them.
What are the odds?
Fascinating. I remember vaguely writing the copy protection scheme, basically fairly easy to defeat, but changing the number of sectors on the specific tracks of the disk that would make standard floppy copying impossible. 
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't distribute it on floppy in the first place?
My uncle isn't exactly a computer genius, so I doubt he'd be able to defeat your copy protection himself 
|
|
|
|
|
Since when do they have two users?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
