|
Hey everyone, I'm the new CodeProject contest manager. We were throwing around a few ideas for our next challenge - something quick and easy - and we came up with the Summer Fun With Arduino[^] challenge. So here we go, June is Arduino month! Entry is simple and you get to make something with flashy lights. We're giving away $5000 in prizes. Give it a shot!
|
|
|
|
|
Is there anything I can do here using my Visual Studio 64-bit?
|
|
|
|
|
RedDk wrote: Is there anything I can do here using my Visual Studio 64-bit?
Certainly, any IoT related Article is acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome aboard!
When does my free Arduino arrive, and how do I get it out of the email? 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: how do I get it out of the email?
Chris is still working on the wormhole. His Astrophysics is a bit rusty.
|
|
|
|
|
David Cunningham wrote: His Astrophysics is a bit rusty.
He'll need a Quantum Mechanic, too!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I knew a Quantum Mechanic once. He took a look at my black hole and told me my big end had gone.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Jovita Dsa wrote: Hey everyone, I'm the new CodeProject contest manager.
We are very self-service, even in HR. Jovita got to introduce herself!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm very glad to see the IoT contest again this year (and looks even better this year).
Thanks for all the great stuff at CP.
I've already begun work on the first challenge. It's a lot of fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome 
modified 13-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome on board! Benvenuta a bordo!
And congratulations: you're the first woman I see on CP in 3 years and 7 months of participation in the community!
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks it's great to be here!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome, Jovita,
The great Sufi poet, Kabir, wrote: "where there is a garden, the flowers will come" ("rahi gulzat to phool khilenge").
I am sure you are a flower, as well as someone who will be an excellent gardener !
cheers, Bill
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the warm welcome!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jovita,
nice to meet you and welcome to the big "family" of CP.
See you around
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
I just wrote this. It works, exactly as it's supposed to.
Common.Initialize<TaxCode>(
dxgTaxCodes,
tc => !tc.Archived,
archiveController.OnTaxCodeDeleted,
archiveController.OnTaxCodeChanging,
onFinalized: (_, __) =>
Common.Initialize<Product>(
dxgProducts,
p => !p.Archived,
archiveController.OnProductDeleted,
archiveController.OnProductChanging,
updateLookups: true,
decoupledLookups: true,
onFinalized: (___, ____) => Common.Initialize<ProductSchedule>(
dxgProductSchedules,
p => !p.Archived,
updateLookups: true,
decoupledLookups: true)));
Here's the code with comments:
Common.Initialize<TaxCode>(
dxgTaxCodes,
tc => !tc.Archived,
archiveController.OnTaxCodeDeleted,
archiveController.OnTaxCodeChanging,
onFinalized: (_, __) =>
Common.Initialize<Product>(
dxgProducts,
p => !p.Archived,
archiveController.OnProductDeleted,
archiveController.OnProductChanging,
updateLookups: true,
decoupledLookups: true,
onFinalized: (___, ____) => Common.Initialize<ProductSchedule>(
dxgProductSchedules,
ps => !ps.Archived,
updateLookups: true,
decoupledLookups: true)));
(I hope the formatting got preserved.)
OK, yeah, this is a bit much.
|
|
|
|
|
Who's this mean green commenting machine?
|
|
|
|
|
That code reminds me of assembler, where I used to pretty much comment every line to explain why the instruction was there.
|
|
|
|
|
I dare you to convert that to VB.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like you have some broad butts in your code.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readability is partially a matter of taste I guess, but I think if the onFinalized's weren't inlined, the three remaining blocks wouldn't be as intimidating anymore and you would probably not need any comments at all.
modified 13-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
