|
Great option for familiarity. A windows-like UI but all the android apps you know and love. Probably more friendly to the average user than Linux.
Er, I can't think of a funny signature right now.
How about a good fart to break the silence?
|
|
|
|
|
Ubuntu wins for its ease of use...
There is Haiku OS for the brave kind....
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Great, thank you.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
None. If you want something that is like Windows, use Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest Linux Mint.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I haven't seen that one yet. I'll check it out.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a tough question, but I'm going to second Linux Mint. I will add though the cinnamon desktop has been my favorite. It'd prove to be the most user friendly desktop for me.
I've recently started working more with Centos and Red Hat at work so I'm using Fedora at home. And again I use the cinnamon desktop, gnome3 with Fedora isn't bad but it can be too tablety. I just couldn't get used to it on my primary computer, though on my travel toss around computer it actually was fine. Probably because I didn't do much outside of web browsing, you tubing, and "word" processing.
Try them all out, the new version of Ubuntu is out in a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice, thanks.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming you are used to the Windows XP UI paradigm, Mint is the right answer. IMHO Ubuntu has started to follow the Windows 8 paradigm to some extent. That is where any similarities stop.
I have started using Linux more and more and the simple reason is choice. The longer you use it the more you start to realize that Windows forces you to work a certain way.
|
|
|
|
|
As a Windows guy, I like Arch; mostly because it taught me Linux.
If your concern is users, though, the Desktop Manager is more of a concern than the distro. I've played with KDE, LXDE, and Gnome and find Gnome to be the best by a huge margin. Gnome actually feels like it isn't completely cobbled together, although sometimes it does drop the ball (the Chromium PIN screen on Gnome is wonky as hell!)
Whichever version you pick, though, bear in mind the maintenance side of it. Ubuntu and Debian both have LTS options, which are the best bet for not having your system randomly break from patching.
|
|
|
|
|
Great. Thanks for the info. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been thinking of putting Linux on my wife's computer, long story, old computer that she wants to keep. Anyway she doesn't need much from it but stability, user friendly and ability to use m.s. Office compatible software (libreoffice).
I'm thinking of gently introducing puppy Linux, which had a very Windows xp UI. The other option is trying ElementaryOS which is like a Mac OS, but also user friendly and stable.
Again Linux As a desktop has a lot to offer, and I'm still trying to figure out the best combination of elements for myself. At least now a days you don't get stuck on trying to work around basic hardware drivers that don't exist on Linux.  hopefully...
|
|
|
|
|
I have tried ubuntu 14.10 LTS.
[^]
After short time you can be productive. Comes with a an office knock off suite.
boots quickly.
On a side note I don't get why many people think its a joke to not answer the question seriously.
I was interested in hearing some positive experiences.
Oh well childish jokes it is.
Microsoft vs Linux
Three Microsoft engineers and three Linux engineers are about to board a train to a computer conference.
The Linux engineers notice that the Microsoft engineers bought only one ticket between them.
The Linux engineers ask the Microsoft engineers how they plan on getting to the conference.
"Watch and learn," one of the Microsoft engineers tells them.
As soon as the train leaves the station, the three Microsoft engineers rush from their seats and
all squeeze into one restroom. When the conductor comes through the car he knocks on the restroom
door and says "ticket please!" The door opens a crack and the one ticket is handed to the conductor.
The Linux engineers are impressed, and decide that's what they will do on the trip back.
Then on the return trip, the Linux engineers notice that the Microsoft engineers haven't bought any tickets.
"How do you plan on getting home without any tickets?" they ask. "Watch and learn,"
one of the Microsoft engineers tells them.
As soon as the train leaves the station, the three Linux engineers hurry for the restroom.
A few moments later, one of the Microsoft engineers gets up from his seat,
knocks on the restroom door and says, "ticket please!"
|
|
|
|
|
Roger165 wrote: I don't get why many people think its a joke to not answer the question seriously
Er ... what else could it be? 
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
You! You started the nonsense. It's all your fault. 
Off with your head.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
Roger165 wrote: I don't get why many people think its a joke to not answer the question seriously.
I knew there would be a few clowns but I was actually expecting a lot better responses. My fault for expecting much from the Loungers. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
To simply answer the question, I find Lubuntu gives a windows feel to ubuntu. Another advantage I have found is that Lubuntu seems to be better at installing on older hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 9742533 wrote: Lubuntu
Hadn't heard of that one.
Member 9742533 wrote: Lubuntu seems to be better at installing on older hardware.
That's actually what I need. Thanks.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
It may also depend on how she uses her computer- if it's mostly a libreoffice platform, if she listens to a lot of music and watches videos, or whatever.
For the media machine, you might want one of the distros that have useful codecs installed, and players that work in a way that makes sense to her. Mint, for example.
Another thing to check out is the repositories a distro uses- are the programs she would like to use available, or do they have to be compiled from source?
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I'd say ZorinOS is made to be most like Windows. Havent used it in a while so I dont know what it's like. Linux Mint Cinnamon is also very good, feels like a hybrid between XP and 7's UX. If you're looking for a modern feel, Ubuntu with Unity (default) or Kubuntu. My sister with Down Syndrome picked up Mint Cinnamon's UI very quickly, and can navigate as well as she did on Windows with a few days of practice.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know. I did install Mint Linux (Cinnamon flavor) on my laptop and it's really not all that different a user experience. You've got a start menu (much better than the Win 10 start menu), a quick launch like panel on the task bar, etc. I tried Win 10 on the laptop for a few months but was unhappy with it so I decided to try Linux. I'm now a happy Linux user. I basically use mostly open source cross platform applications (jEdit, Octave, Firefox, Thunderbird, Libre Office, g++, etc) so it was really an easy switch for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Why bother? Microsoft periodically re-envisions their user interface from the ground up anyway. So what's the difference between some Linux UI and the next re-envisioning that Microsoft does -- you'll still have to learn where the cheese is all over again. Just pick your favorite Linux and pretend its the latest re-envisioning of the UI from Microsoft.
What you're really wanting, is a cross reference between how to do something in a version of Windows you know, and how to do the equivalent thing in some version of Linux. There's probably books that cover that, but a google search will get you pretty far too.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
patbob wrote: Why bother?
Learning curve.
patbob wrote: What you're really wanting, is a cross reference between how to do something in a version of Windows you know, and how to do the equivalent thing in some version of Linux.
Ya, but without having to read a book. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Linux Mint (with cinnamon) start very windows-like UI configuration. This is how it looks[^].
However, be aware that linux provide you with a power (to customize), so you'll probably end up with something entirely different from Windows. Once you taste the freedom of your own design, you'll be unable to return to the slavery of using whatever were provided. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
