Welcome to the Lounge

dandy72 wrote:

Well at least that one's easy to fix, get another monitor

Eric Lippert wrote:[^]:

C# enforces the no-fall-through rule in every switch section, including the last one. This is so that switch sections can be re-ordered arbitrarily, possibly by mechanical tools, without introducing semantic changes in the program.

C# enforces the no-fall-through rule by requiring that the end point of every switch section be unreachable. It is not necessary for a switch section to end in a break. It can end in a break, return, goto, continue, throw, or a detectable infinite loop:

Richard Deeming wrote:

detectable infinite loop

case 1,
     2,
     3:
   ... code
   break;
case 4:
   ... code
   break;

case 1,
     2,
     3:
   {
      ... code
      break;
   }
case 4:
   {
   ... code
   break;
   }

OriginalGriff wrote:

Or even:

Pascal

case 1,
     2,
     3:
   {
      ... code
      break;
   }
case 4:
   {
      ... code
      break;
   }

trønderen wrote:

C is called a machine independent assembler.

wapiti64 wrote:

free years of Experian

theoldfool wrote:

It seems to me that the people on the dark side have it much easier.