|
Interesting.
As a side note, I am not entirely against ads, since they pay (minutely?) the youtuber.
But ads are becoming more and more obnoxious. As in 2 in a row, longer, and increasingly poor taste - like they purposely target me with things I don't like hoping perhaps, I will finally click them this time!?
(I guess this is the push for youtube red... nut I resisted and subscribe to Nebula instead!)
|
|
|
|
|
In my student days, I read a 3-part article series in one of the ACM publications, I believe that it was Communication of the ACM. In these articles, a couple - both with a high university degree in software development - building a new home decided to automate absolutely everything that could possibly be automated (at that time). The articles described first the design of their basic software and hardware, how it was build in the first stage. Then came the second stage: How to make it absolutely foolproof. If my memory is correct, the second stage cost three times as much to realize as the first stage.
I completed my studies in 1983, and read these articles late in my studies, in the university library copies of the publication, so I never had a hardcopy of my own. The date of publication must have been somewhere from 1980 to 1983.
Does this ring a bell to any of you old timers? Or do you have access to a searchable archive of ACM publications from those years, so you can look it up? I'd really like to pick up these articles again, to see how much home automation has progressed (or not ) in forty years!
|
|
|
|
|
They are still working on the foolproof part. But the universe keeps coming up with better fools.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
https://dl.acm.org/magazines
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
It's not something I have heard of but the parallels with modern software development are interesting -
I have just spent 27 hours doing software security training and the training was what I would consider "the basics" and language/platform/framework agnostic.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
trønderen wrote: How to make it absolutely foolproof. If my memory is correct, the second stage cost three times as much to realize as the first stage.
I can't remember the full passage in Mostly Harmless, but Douglas Adams wrote Quote: A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
He then went on to explain a company's brand new HVAC unit that was so completely foolproof that they sealed all the windows shut. He went on to say that when something that is completely foolproof *does* fail, it is impossible to fix. The inevitable failure of the HVAC unit led to riots.
Anyway, you made me think of that, and then that made me smile. I have nothing to offer in the way of help, other than a gentle suggestion to give Mostly Harmless a read some time, if nothing else because it's funny.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
|
And then there's this about Ken Olsen --
In 1977, referring to computers used in home automation at the dawn of the home computer era, Olsen is quoted as saying "There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home."
|
|
|
|
|
There was a similar series in Byte at about the same time - look up Steve Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that makes the rest of us Customer Failure Generalists?
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Customer Failure Generalists
Only a double negative. What you want is
Supplier Failure Generalists
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
That sounds like it has to be a euphemism for something.
I wonder what kind of person applies for such a position?
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or in the case of a small town:
Someone’s lover.
That way you have the town paying for the love nest!
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I wonder what kind of person applies for such a position?
Very oddly, he has a degree in geography (one can get a degree in that???) from University of Alberta, speaking of Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you must have hard headed customers?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks god. This will change everything!
|
|
|
|
|
So you hired someone to handle the support calls?
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Code words for "do it yourself".
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Have heard of a post called "Customer Happiness Officer".
The opposite of this is "Employee Sadness Officer".
|
|
|
|
|
Amarnath S wrote: "Employee Sadness Officer".
This is also known as a Manager a.k.a. Pointy Haired Boss.
Kelly Herald
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
Or HR droid, AKA Catbert.
(Usually Catberta)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
For various reasons, I'm considering moving north to Canada in coming years. I don't have a timeline prepared but things are slowly moving in that direction.
I live fairly close to the southern border of Canada anyway, and know many Canadians. I even dated one years ago.
Because of that, and because of my many visits, I know there's a lot to like about it.
But when I'm making a serious purchase, I like to know what people *don't like* about a product, and I'm thinking along similar lines here.
What's your *least favorite* part about living in Canada, for those of you that do or have?
I'm not looking to dish on your lovely country, so much as to get a fuller picture.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: For various reasons, I'm considering moving north to Canada Have you considered Ottawa? I see your U.S. domestic mail is already being forwarded there.
|
|
|
|
|