|
|
How do I send a private reply. I guess I code too much to read directions. I see where it "Allow private email replies to this message".
|
|
|
|
|
I recently posted a resume online; now it seems 30 different agencies have picked it up. My Inbox is flooded with job postings daily, even weekends. The problem is, not one of those agencies has ever read my resume. None of the postings are remotely related to anything I do, although I did think about driving a truck once. Morons all!!!
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel your pain.
Sometimes the title is "Software develeoper" and then you find is Java related...
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
Not a Programming Question:
A group of artists in our community gathered yesterday for an informal "hey, what are you working on" and the facilitator collected emails and phone #'s. She would now like to distribute this contact list among the people that were at the gathering.
In the past, she's accidentally cc'd everyone on a list, resulting in all of us getting spammed because someone on that list had some malware.
Is there a best practice for emailing people a contact list that includes emails and cell #'s?
Obviously she should bcc everyone when sending the email, but what about the content of the email which would have everyone's contact information? Is there a way to "safely" email that to people?
It's one of those weird questions that I really don't have a clue about!
[edit]For these not-so-computer-savvy people, what do you think about a link to a password protected dropbox folder in the email? [/edit]
modified 15-Sep-22 7:38am.
|
|
|
|
|
What threat vector(s) are you trying to protect against?
If you're just worried about malware scanning the body of a message for email addresses, then perhaps a plain-text file inside a password-protected zip file attachment might be good enough.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: then perhaps a plain-text file inside a password-protected zip file attachment Love that idea, unfortunately these artiste's would have no clue how to handle that.
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of Patton Oswalts Physics for Poets...
|
|
|
|
|
I create noreply / autodelete "group send" accounts, and email to that with a BCC to everybody. That way, no private info is ever exposed.
Herself's workplace has done that twice: first time everyone was polite(ish), second time the boss got some really nasty messages and veiled threats ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 11-Nov-22 12:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Not everyone uses protonmail.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
You could use one of them messengers, if you'd be stupid enough to believe they never leak.
Simple answer; you don't. You might just as well include passwords in there, please, in plaintext for GMails' convenience.
You make sure they can login on a page for your community, and you DO NOT mail them the password in plaintext. Ever.
Marc Clifton wrote: [edit]For these not-so-computer-savvy people, what do you think about a link to a password protected dropbox folder in the email? [/edit]
I'll ignore that hit; what do you think, methinks of dropbox? Can YOU guarantee to me that they do not leak?
Snailmail, paper, ever heard of it?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: I'll ignore that hit; Sorry, I wasn't meaning artists in general, I was referring to my knowledge of how computer-not-savvy people are in this specific community.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: methinks of dropbox? Can YOU guarantee to me that they do not leak? No, but I'm not looking for 100%, just cover the basics of not posting a list of email addresses into an email.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Snailmail, paper, ever heard of it? Yes, very much an option!
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Yes, very much an option!
That then; mailaddress means you can track them, and they'd need be unique. Hard to get a new one too.
Might be more modern to require them to log in with a phone, sending an sms as proof of origin; that's electronic paper, but same idea; though getting a new SIM is cheaper than changing an address.
I'd prefer to not receive a list at all. I'd prefer to send my crap to some server on your side, and have them login there to see that message. That way, my phone number and mail can be kept private, while still being able to communicate with the group.
Like here, on CodeProject; you can contact me, easily; yet you do not have my mail address, nor my phones. Also, phones is never needed anyway, only for emergencies - emergencies meaning you need either firedepartment, ambulance or police. All other stuff can wait in my email until I take the time to read it.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I know when filling stuff out online I have put in comments my email with myemail at myDomain dot com
Replacing the @ sign with space at space and the period with space dot space seems to be enough that the autobots cannot decipher it.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
rnbergren wrote: Replacing the @ sign with space at space and the period with space dot space seems to be enough that the autobots cannot decipher it. That is definitely the simplest and easiest solution, and probably would work well enough.
|
|
|
|
|
sometimes the simplest solution is the best.
Also this gives you the ease of just using global edit replace in the document before you send and after they receive on their end.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
How many artist are we talking about? Names, emails and cell numbers? That's near identity theft. And one can now guess the "near" location.
This is private business between (individual) members. (IMO)
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I understood your question/problem correctly, you want everyone in a mailing list to have everyone else's contact information, but you don't want the contact information able to be hijacked. Is this even remotely close?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
if any have gmail - then use email address as meemail+groupname@gamil.com
that way that individual can trace any spam collection
as with most thing I compare the alternative, to be able to saw tech is not as scary or miss informed as the media has made it out to be
telephone books had/has name and telephone number, possible also your home address that last bit is more scare then any other
sharing a list of email and names in an email to said group should not be a concern unless an individual is purposefully malicious. If one is also hacked, worst case is some spam email. If they that concerned they they would have 2 email accounts, one for personal/sensitive work and one for friends and family.
to repeat - Name + Email address should be fine to share.
including a phone number and home address maybe a little to much, and why do they need that much shared.
last resort: write a text document, print it out and share at next meeting. - oh, why Bill never respond, because typo error.
|
|
|
|
|
I found myself in the uncomfortable position of defending someone else's messy code recently.
It was for a Truetype engine for games, designed for a PC but I adapted it to run on IoT devices.
It's a single header library, which makes it nice, but it's unintelligible.
Part of the problem is TTF is an extremely unwieldy format and things get weird fast. This header handles that and the rendering in an amazingly small footprint.
It's also actively maintained and that's the sticker for me.
Avoiding sanitizing the code allows me to more easily backport updates into my adaptation the more the code is the same as the original.
Your thoughts?
For reference, here's the file after I got done modifying it to stream. lvgl/stb_truetype_htcw.h at master · codewitch-honey-crisis/lvgl · GitHub[^]
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
It does not look all that bad! The code is messy, but not convoluted...
maybe one or 200-line-functions functions could be broken down. And I would [aim to] wrap inline IFDEF s in functions: like
#ifdef STBTT_STREAM_TYPE
STBTT_STREAM_TYPE data = info->data;
#else
=>
STBTT_STREAM_TYPE data = getInfoData()
I would push such improvements upstream.
If I had the time.
Which happens.
Never.
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with wrapping that is it significantly increases the amount of surface area I would need to alter in the source from the original, and I'm trying to keep that to a minimum. You'll note that a lot of functions pass info->data around without regard for its type. This would kill that, unfortunately.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds OK to me. It sounds contained. And if it's maintained, someone understands it. It becomes a problem if it has to be enhanced and no one who understands it is around any longer.
|
|
|
|