|
Ok so your another grumpy old bugger resisting change, we seem to be of the same opinion on the subject of accessing the database.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: you're another grumpy old bugger
Well, yes, that's true.
Mycroft Holmes wrote: resisting change,
Now I know what you are saying is a little toungue in cheek, but I do rather tend to stick to the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" aphorism.
Mycroft Holmes wrote: we seem to be of the same opinion on the subject of accessing the database.
... but one of us is more verbose
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: grumpy old bugger
Mycroft Holmes wrote: be of the same opinion on the subject of accessing the database
Maybe we could form our own sub-group.
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: using any ORM is more trouble than it is worth
My thoughts exactly. ORMs are designed to solve just a small easy subset of problems, but many developers think they should be used whenever you access a database. The programs I write have absolutely no use for an ORM at all.
_Maxxx_ wrote: a list of country names with their IDs
Exactly; there is no need to define (manually or automatically) a specific class to hold that information, a DataTable does just fine.
ORMs are the realm of Architecture Astronauts:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html[^]
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/05/01.html[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I couldn't have expressed it better.
_Maxxx_ wrote: I agree that Linq to SQL is a heap of doggy-do used by developers too thick to learn SQL (controversial? Maybe)
Maybe to the ones that are thick...
Politicians are always realistically manoeuvering for the next election. They are obsolete as fundamental problem-solvers.
Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If only!
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
I picture Chevy Chase entering the country club dining room.
|
|
|
|
|
Gratz
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations !
"What Turing gave us for the first time (and without Turing you just couldn't do any of this) is he gave us a way of thinking about and taking seriously and thinking in a disciplined way about phenomena that have, as I like to say, trillions of moving parts.
Until the late 20th century, nobody knew how to take seriously a machine with a trillion moving parts. It's just mind-boggling." Daniel C. Dennett
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Does that mean I need to call you by a title?
Politicians are always realistically manoeuvering for the next election. They are obsolete as fundamental problem-solvers.
Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I already have an academic title[^] and you've never called me by that either... But now is a good time to start!
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Somehow I have the feeling that there's more bang in the drs. than in the MCP.
But until you update your signature to implement the MCP and drs. interfaces I'll keep calling you Naerling Sander.
Politicians are always realistically manoeuvering for the next election. They are obsolete as fundamental problem-solvers.
Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: I'll keep calling you Naerling Sander. Actually this is the first time you called me that (at least to my digital face)
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations.
Signature construction in progress. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Damn you have the perfect signature - CBadger
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats!
But you don't wanna read CG's replies from one of my frequent answer(s) for certification questions in Q/A section
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Spammers all over the world must be busy stuffing their gut today. More than 80% of my daily emails are spam. That ratio has dropped to nearly zero today!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Hadn't really noticed it until you said something, I haven't got near the disposable email today either.
Of course now that you've said something the flood gates will open?
|
|
|
|
|
Heh. Very likely will.
/ravi
|
|
|
|