|
I was waiting fot that. OK, how about Bin Laden?
Personaly dead or alive, scum is scum.
|
|
|
|
|
Given that Hitler has been dead for too long and people tend to mention Bin Laden a lot these days, is there a similar law related to Bin Laden?
|
|
|
|
|
The ANC attacked government installations while fighting for freedom.
Bin Laden attacked civilians.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: The ANC won in the end
Weren't the U2 who won that fight?
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but they are still playing "Sunday bloody Sunday" so it doesn't count.
|
|
|
|
|
You are right! They still haven't found what they were looking for.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
They dropped it in The Ocean back in October - or was it New Years Day?
|
|
|
|
|
Doesnt matter who won, he was stil a terrorist at a time when soneone else of true nobility fought sucessfully against apartheid without resorting to violence.
|
|
|
|
|
This is in about as poor a taste as I can think of and does not belong here.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
Oh really?
So someone dies and the apoplectic fake grief and cynical 'virtue by association' of the worlds leaders despite the gory past of this man does not make you want to puke?
Dont talk to me of bad taste.
|
|
|
|
|
pwasser wrote: This is in about as poor a taste as I can think of
Err...either you need to get out more or you probably need to give up looking at anything on the internet.
Stick to the kiddy section of the local library, books only, and you should be good.
|
|
|
|
|
By that definition, George Washington and his cronies[^] were terrorists who should have been hanged for treason.
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
The English rebels, for they were English at the time, carried out bombing attacks killing civilians did they?
|
|
|
|
|
Erudite_Eric wrote:
The English rebels, for they were English at the
time, carried out bombing attacks killing civilians did they? Yes, actually. There are numerous accounts in American history where revolutionary soldiers, acting on orders from their commanders, blew up depots where the British had been storing gunpowder resulting in much personal and property "collateral damage." While the "tea party" in Boston Harbor is famous, it was only one of a great many such acts. People seen as being sympathetic to the British were assaulted and beaten by mobs, and it was not unusual for such people to have their homes ransacked, farms burned to the ground and places of business utterly destroyed. There are numerous recorded instances of political lynching. Former patriots like Benedict Arnold did not abandon the revolution and return to the British out of any sense of loyalty to the Crown; they abandoned the revolution in disgust at what the revolutionaries were willing to do for their independence.
|
|
|
|
|
Then by deffinition they were terrorists too.
Of course that doesnt mean Mamndella was any more justified.
|
|
|
|
|
Figures produced by the South African government state that ANC actions caused the death of about 130 civilians[^]. The South African security forces killed more than that in one day at Sowete[^], so who were the terrorists?
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
They were Traitors and should have hanged.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
I am on their side actually. It was just the Englich Civil War part 2, fighting against a king trying to impose unjust taxation.
In fact many at the time were also on their side, many British Officiers refused to take part in any attempt to control the rebellion.
|
|
|
|
|
Erudite_Eric wrote: unjust taxation
I pity you. I never knew unjust taxation was a greater crime than apartheid.
|
|
|
|
|
Is that supposed to be clever or something?
I merely point out to Dave that I would be on the side of the english rebels and you attempt to make it look as if I think unjust taxation is worse than apartheid.
Where did you fail to read the bit where I described Martin Luther King as noble and heroic for his passive fight against segregation?
Oh sorry, yes, you just plain forgot to read that bit in your quest for cheap virtue by trying to paint me a racist.
Idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
Erudite_Eric wrote: Idiot.
I kinda like your signature.
|
|
|
|
|
It's the one he uses on letters and cheques as well...
|
|
|
|
|
Same old fatboy only arguing the parts that he wants to shout about and ignoring the parts that disagree with his views.
from the I would suggest you give yourself a clap, well done you!
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
The point I wanted to make is that you support English rebels who indulged in armed resistance against unjust taxation but you label an armed resistance against apartheid as terrorism. I cannot see it as anything else other than bigotry and racism.
|
|
|
|
|
He's a Troll - it doesn't have to make sense as long as it gets a response.
I've already had to invoke Godwin's Law, but he hasn't shut up...
Basically: Don't Feed The Troll!
|
|
|
|