|
It stems from the early CodeProject days when a bunch of hamsters escaped from the Maunder home and went feral.
Till this day they thrive in the wamth of the CodeProject datacenters.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point ... Let's investigate as I am also quite curious about this, and I never heard this before except in the Lounge ... and, this interview A Coder Interview With Chris Maunder points to Chris
modified 6-Jan-23 15:59pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Dunno, whether or not it pre-existed CP, but I think the concept is that the servers are powered by hamsters running in their wheels. Which would explain why things may appear markedly slower at times -- the hamsters need feeding.
And when the hamsters get out, things go bad.
|
|
|
|
|
If memory serves, CP severs are built from used iPhones. Tens of thousands of them. You need a lot of minions to service and maintain all these devices. Only a high number of well trained and occasionally electroshocked hamsters can pull of this kind of task.
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, iPAQ PDAs: The New CodeProject Web Farm[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I can't believe that no one has answered correctly yet.
It is in honor of Chris' mother, a hamster.
|
|
|
|
|
Although his father was quite lucky to find Sambucus[^] in the southern hemisphere.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Because if he had called them Guinea Pigs they might have started to refuse the injections!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Damn - looks like we need to change the hamsters in the cage.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
That's the earliest reference I can find.
Followed by this[^] in March 2003.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Are we just delayed due to holiday hangovers? Am I being too impatient? It seems like it has been awhile since the last one.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Software development isn't a contest.
|
|
|
|
|
Uh oh. Someone has clearly hacked my profile and put all these fake contest wins in it.
honey the codewitch - Professional Profile[^]
Who do I talk to about that?
PS: I didn't say software development was a contest. You strongly implied I said that. There's a rather large difference between those two things.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: PS: I didn't say software development was a contest. You strongly implied I said that Yeah, but this is the Internet. We're not supposed to read the posts we reply to.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris going on holiday? We can't have that!
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
If you mean the monthly competition, I didn't think it was fair to articles submitted late December for the contest to start Jan 2.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is pushing on us this system as an alternative (instead of .net core and Blazor) of rewriting some big old order and data processing applications. Anybody with any experience on this? At first glance I'm genuinely scared.
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Yet another no code attempt. Of course Microsoft has to jump on the bandwagon. Nothing to get scared about.
|
|
|
|
|
And I doubt they'll eat this dog food.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. What I'm scared of is that we will put a lot of effort in this conversion and at the end it will become clear that there are "too many exceptions" and the project will be scraped. Or the end result will be unusable mess.
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
I would never look at a no/low code solution for a project - you will inevitably encounter something that the no/low code can't do.
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the day the thing low code cannot do is "be a developer" I think.
What happens in low code if you make, with its help, an error of intent instead of function?
That is, "it worked as designed" but the design was wrong?
When you have developers, you say "Oh, you guys got the design wrong. We meant <x>." (Kidding, mostly)
You (as a developer) go do data-doctoring and maybe take care of some other adhoc processes that need to spin off and happen as a result of the issue.
In low code? Do you just start pursuing creating those tasks in low code? How do you even know the need exists?
|
|
|
|
|
Do a head to head eval based on Gartner magic quadrant for low code. There are at least three products I would recommend ahead of MS power apps.
My memories of power apps demos/POCs:
Trying to write a simple formula to enable/disable a button based on a few other fields was barely writable and unintelligible.
Good luck writing the logic to prevent users from double clicking a button and submitting the form twice!
|
|
|
|
|
I read here somewhere recently that Google is pushing to make Risc V de riguer for Android phones.
In addition Espressif has IoT MCUs based on Risc V processors, and appears to be moving to Risc V for their new projects.
This tells me Risc V is suitable for CPUs with a wide range of capabilities.
It's about damned time they standardized a CPU architecture in a practical way that could be leveraged across the tech industry.
I'm really interested in this technology, and although I'm not a fan of Espressif's current Risc V offerings, which are low power, but kind of anemic, they have a soon to be released offering
The ESP32P4
Triple core (2x400MHz, 1xULP40MHz), 768kB of SRAM, 50 GPIO, wireless connectivity for days, all Risc V based.
And if Android primarily adopts it, how long before Windows follows suit?
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|