|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: Well here[^] is what they do when they are pissed with each other. That's brutal!
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Maxxx wrote: poor taste
So why'd you eat her?
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Because the barbie was ready!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Maxxx wrote: ** That was a joke in poor taste Really? I've heard they taste quite good.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
I can realte to that: my entire male bloodline has the same features, to the point that in my Grand-grandfather birthplace, where family nicknames instead of proper surnames are commonly used, our family nickname translates from the local dialect to "goat" because we always look angry
And when I'm chillaxing my face ranges from apathy trough looking-for-trouble, so people often misjudge me or my intentions
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
And what do you look like when you are really angy? Is it a look that scares children for life?
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
|
|
|
|
|
From what people tell me, yes!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
Did somebody mention lambs?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You must get really excited when folk start talking about lambda expressions
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Just don't believe what they say !
Take a horse[^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Um... No pain, no gain?
OK, that's about as motivational as I can get, when I'm worried about getting home to find that my house doesn't have a roof.
OTOH, cycling in 100+kph winds is FANTASTIC!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I believe this one[^] is a must-have flow chart for beginners to help them get into programming. Definitely will help us to get some rest from "Which programming language to learn" questions in QA.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Big version: clicky[^]
modified 31-Mar-15 3:16am.
|
|
|
|
|
It's missing VB, my first language
|
|
|
|
|
And you wonder why?
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, VB can do the same as C#, just using different syntax.
I had no trouble moving from VB to C#, it's all .NET after all.
Sure, VB does some things differently, but they're mostly the same.
Despite VB being my first language I turned out just fine. I know OO, SOLID, Design Patterns, C-syntax and, yes, BASIC-syntax! I think it makes me a better programmer and so I can say I'm a proud VB programmer
The only thing that's holding VB back is this ridiculous hate against it, which comes from a BASIC that's 25 years old!
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: ridiculous hate against it (VB) I never have used VB apart from academic projects (3-4 years back) and the only thing bugged me that time was its crazy syntax. So I think you have a point here.
I maybe wrong but I think there are some features in C#, which are not there in VB.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: I maybe wrong but I think there are some features in C#, which are not there in VB VB had features that weren't in C# for years, like filtered catch blocks, optional parameters and late binding functionality
On the other hand VB didn't support iterators (yield return) until .NET version 4.5 (VB version 12 or something?).
A few years ago VB also had better type inference for generics (not sure if that's still the case though).
As far as I know Microsoft now keeps the languages mostly equal.
I'm not saying VB is the best language out there, or that it is better than C# (I love C#), but the unreasonable hate against VB just ticks me off
|
|
|
|
|
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: It's missing VB, my first language mistake
FTFY
|
|
|
|
|
The only mistake is that so many people hate on VB.
More precisely, they hate on a VB that's 25 years old and never bothered to get to know the modern VB, which can do the same as C# just using different syntax (and sometimes a bit different overall).
|
|
|
|
|
Just kidding I know VB can do more or less the same as C#.. I think I actually read about some detail it could do better. I just can't stand the verbose syntax..
(and in case of lambdas, the objectively crude syntax! )
/Sascha
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefévre wrote: and in case of lambdas, the objectively crude syntax! Agreed
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: It's missing VB, my first language
Edsger W. Dijkstra wrote: It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.
Congratulations for being an exception that proves the rule.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
The BASIC Dijkstra talks about cannot be compared to the Visual Basic we use today
|
|
|
|