|
GoG are doing a weekend special which includes a game from '98: Die By The Sword[^] That caused me to buy a joystick many, mnay years ago.
Compared to modern games, it's pretty poor graphically, but...you swing your weapon with the mouse (or joystick) which makes it a load of fun.
And...best of all...you can clobber the bad guys with anything you pick up.
So you can hack his sword arm off, pick it up, and beat him to death with the wet end!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: So you can hack his sword arm off, pick it up, and beat him to death with the wet end! Tis but a flesh wound...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
None shall pass!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Was this inspired by Slayer or the other way around?
Or perhaps both were inspired by something else.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: you swing your weapon with the mouse (or joystick) which makes it a load of fun.
Ever played Jedi Knight ?
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy clarinetist wit no sex appeal steals away (9)
One day I aspire to having a signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy clarinetist (ANAG)
wit no sex appeal (Remove IT)
steals away
LARCENIST
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yay
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Very quick, thought it might be a bit too easy. Have fun with Monday's.
One day I aspire to having a signature.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Crazy clarinetist (ANAG) This much even I can get, but:
OriginalGriff wrote: wit no sex appeal (Remove IT) Would you care to explain this?
THX
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
"wit no" == badly spelled "with no" from the context (probably a typo in the original).
"sex appeal" == "it" as in "it girl[^]"
So "wit no sex appeal" == "remove IT"
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 29-May-15 14:51pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Link fail.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed: that "paste link over highlight can truncate the link" bug is still there, I see...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Bacon Mac-n-Cheese Quesadilla[^]
No explanation needed.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
No, I believe and explanation is in order.
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: No explanation More bacon needed.
FTFY.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
The recipe omitted a step:
6. Call 911. After you've eaten this, your myocardial infarction will begin almost immediately.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Take out the Mac 'n Cheese, then we can talk.
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one who wants a feature in visual studio (or any other IDE) that can have images as comments? The idea would be that you have some sort of button in the side bar (when an image was attached at that location) and if you hover over it you see the image you attached.
This image could contain a use-case, a drawing or a print out of a file you read in as example, ...
If we think further you could attach paragraphs of the functional/technical documentation that are relevant for this piece of code. (but that might be overdoing it too)
Just thinking out loud, but I feel the plain text comment is not sufficient
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't want to have that per line of code. Imagine the PM demanding that you add the relevant Use Case / Requirement paragraph per LOC.
Requirements Engineers, Testers and so on aren't developers, this being the reason why they write a documents and not code. Linking these roles might become a problem. Think about persistence.
|
|
|
|
|
You write so many comments then? I doubt there will be many managers enforcing the developers to include every single line of documentation to the code.
In short, this can never be the goal ?
|
|
|
|
|
V. wrote: You write so many comments then
No. But we're discussing enough about what and how to commente, imagine Requirement & Use Case Engineering people being dragged into the very same discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
I think having an attachment cover a section of code (say a method or a class) was what V. was getting at.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting idea. And how should those attachments be noted in the code? A path in the comments? (With something like ATTACHMENT: starting it?) should paths be relative to the solution directory or the project directory? Should they be absolute (would break on other systems)?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|