|
|
MIT === Mythology Institute of Technology
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't they choose Delphi to be consistent with the Mythology thing ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Delphi belongs to the department of Archaeology...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
While VB/VBA may be more relevant to them when working with office etc I would not recommend using it as a teaching tool. There is a vast number of support resources out there on the web and the bulk of them are in c#.
There is no financial cost difference between c# and VB.net, both are available as express versions (free) and they will certainly meet your students requirements. VBA comes with office (at a cost) but you are talking web sites!
However you are about to get feedback/recommendations on a whole range of web development tools which you are going to need to consider.
No doubt someone will downvote your question because you are new to the site and this may be construed as a programming question by some prat, ignore the downvote when it comes and persist!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I argue that C# is simpler than VB.net anyway. It flows better and it has fewer reserved words -- and reserved words have a negative side-effect in that they tend to hinder globalization.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I argue that C# is simpler than VB.net anyway Possibly but if they have already worked with VBA then they have been polluted with the VB syntax and there is a learning curve to moving to c#. It is worth the cost in effort just to access the support resources on the interweb.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
By the same token, with my C and C# experience I had difficulty learning the basics of VB.net ; old dog / new trick. I find VB.net just too restrictive and inflexible.
I'm saying that for they with no experience in either of these two languages, the choice should be C#.
A non-serious student with some experience with one of these two languages should probably continue in that language.
Serious students, of course, need to learn several.
I was speaking with one of my nephews-in-law this past weekend and he has learned some Java, Python, and C# so I think he'll be alright.
|
|
|
|
|
mr_peter wrote: * C# is OK, but cost, install, framework etc are still an issue What cost? It's free. And you don't even need Windows, so it's double free.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought C# ran only in a .Net / Windows environment.
Tell me more...
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Studio Community Edition is free for use in classrooms or individual use[^].
And the few limitations[^] there are compared to Professional edition, is probably nothing to worry about for your needs.
If you want another environment than windows you should check out Mono[^].
modified 16-Dec-15 2:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
How about PERL. A book I once read explains that PERL is written in simple English.
But seriously folks...
I vote for Python simply because it is quite easy to learn and it is free.
I may not last forever but the mess I leave behind certainly will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn Perl or die?
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I thought C# ran only in a .Net / Windows environment" ... sorry, and YOU are teaching at which University?
Business does not expect teaching institutions to be fully informed of the subject matter they prescribe to qualify their students in, but something as widely known as the above is a basic expectation.
Brutally honest, but a fact - and scores a fail.
|
|
|
|
|
There is also free C# via csc.exe and VB.net via vbc.exe. Each version of .NET on Windows comes with compilers. They probably won't help too much if you are targeting web platform, but sufficient for simple Console programming tasks like you might perform in an intro class.
You could go old school and target a CGI type of web experience where the server runs executables that Console.WriteLine the web page output. (Not very transferable to the job market, but that is how it all started...) If this is for a grade, this approach would be easy to grade.
|
|
|
|
|
Answer is clearly javascript. It is an easy to learn but powerful language and it is very broadly used in the internet. Every modern browser has development tools for javascript on board for FREE.
Dont get worried with the "script" in the name, it has modern object syntax and rich callback support.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
KarstenK wrote: Dont get worried with the "script" in the name,
Sure. It's even better than C-64 BASIC and at least twice as awkward to use. The whole idea is to teach them something, not to scare them away.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Question is how far in the rabbit hole you'd like to venture.
If you teach them web site things: HTML, CSS and javascript are a must and yes, somewhat at low level, however you could limit this be letting them do some selfstudy on eg. w3schools[^].
eg. you give them a assignment to build a small basic website that uses all the basic concepts, after that you can move to tools that generate html/css and the likes for more complex assignments. make sure they check the work accross browsers and also touch a bit on frameworks (jquery).
There is Visual Studio Express, which is free. C# is closer to javascript concerning syntax. But I have the feeling that server side code might be too much for this course, ESPECIALLY if some are non-coders a standard coding assignment is already hard enough, let alone a web development.
just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
|
There is not such a thing (programming language for non-programmers).
There are, of course, non-programmers using programming languages every day, everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
From your specification it looks to me like "web programming for beginners". As C# is marked "OK...but" I would suggest to go for C# added by basic ASP.NET because it can do indeed "simple web pages", and is completely free on Windows. I did a course like this on Windows + IIS some years ago and it was doable with C#, because C# is easy to explain and to teach. It is easy to show how to do web forms with clickable buttons etc in asp.net ...
Regards,
|
|
|
|
|
I'd seriously consider JavaScript (More specifically, TypeScript).
There's plenty of available information on the MEAN stack, and it has the distinct benefit of allowing you to tailor the experience to the capabilities of the students with little effort. Each stack element has a bit of a learning curve, but I strongly suspect that some of them (specifically Angular) are not so step if one doesn't walk in with preconceived notions.
For tools, you can use JetBrains WebStorm (which is fantastic) with free licenses for classroom environments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps something more agnostic and free to academia, like Ada (the GNAT and GPS products), courtesy of Adacore? I would have suggested Simula and Beta but they appear to be defunct.
My first programming language was Algol, for freshman math labs, and I now work with C#/.NET. Yes we used keypunch and teletype machines. The first programming course I attended taught a pseudo-assembler that the instructor bench-checked before covering Basic, Fortran, and COBOL in a single semester.
Teach students to build functions and procedures in VBA using Excel and Access. Those tools are not departing any time soon. Use the R language to teach data analytics if you like.
Examine the web development features of Access as an advanced topic later in the introductory semester.
Teach debugging skills with an interactive debugger. I consider debuggers the biggest productivity booster in an IDE.
In conclusion, the initial language isn't terribly relevant. Languages will change. Whether students feel they can take things one step further on their own is key.
|
|
|
|