|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: Another case of publishing something on the interweb that you would not want to say!
I make sure I grumble just as much in the office as I do here.
I just don't give a faarrrkkkk about what I say and who reads it.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote: I just don't give a faarrrkkkk about what I say and who reads it. We noticed.
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
There is no saying how your words could be misinterpreted by someone somewhere. Internet shaming is all the rage, and potential employers could find out about you from what you post.
A separate anonymous account is the only safe method to post what you honestly think.
|
|
|
|
|
Just make sure there's about a 100 posts between your article and your last rant.
I don't think coworkers will actually check your message history (they really have better things to do).
But the few that do certainly won't go back a 100 messages.
I've posted some sh*t on here about coworkers in the past.
Even I can't find the posts anymore, let alone coworkers or employers
|
|
|
|
|
Just create 2 accounts. I think you need a separate email address per account. I have been thinking about doing the same thing, for a while now. I could never use Slacker007 for anything "serious".
There are quite a few members here, that do the same thing, already.
|
|
|
|
|
This is why I always use my real name online - as a reminder never to post anything that I would not want my employer/neighbours/friends to read.
I think that the possibility of this happening is an important moderator on the level of ranting/abuse. I would therefore vote against such an option. After all, we can only be judged by our posts, warts and all.
OTOH, I would not require everyone to use their "real" names because of possible repercussions in some countries.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Vunic wrote: So I'm gonna create a "Professional account" that I'd just use it for writing articles alone.
That's a good idea. I have the opposite problem. I often hit the Cancel button after I've written a rant about the retard brilliant person I have to work with. I need to create a "can't track back to me" account. Then again, just writing it seems therapeutic enough so that I have the wherewithal to actually Cancel the post.
But then I'll just forget to check who I'm signed is as and post the wrong thing on the wrong account.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I vote that you create another account just for your rants! You and JSOP have some of the best rants around. Not that your other posts are drivel but a good rant is most enjoyable - from the outside!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Vunic wrote: option in the Message editor to mark a message as "Don't list in history".
That sort of defeats the point of that list.
You can use the search page[^] to efficiently get a list of your own messages. The "List all messages" is actually for others to see what you've written. Either to follow your witty repartee or to spot the spammer / abuser.
So no - that option won't be added. Sorry.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That's okay. Thanks for the reply Chris. Just checking the notifications.
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Terry Callier - Ordinary Joe[^]
It's an oldie, a lot older than me anyway, but I've listened to Terry Callier quite a lot in the past.
This week I came across it again and put it in my playlist.
The result was me swinging and playbacking to some good old jazz in my chair at work
It made working a pleasure and I got a lot of work done
Deserved song of the week!
|
|
|
|
|
Great song - it reminded me so much of Rumer's song Am I forgiven[^] - without a doubt Rumer took the baseline from Ordinary Joe.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Nice song! And it DOES sound like Ordinary Joe!
|
|
|
|
|
Soapbox please
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what you're talking about...
Why would a song be Soapbox material?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know why, but someone got something against Bruno and kept downvoting his posts no matter what he posted.
|
|
|
|
|
I have to agree with Sander - that isn't soapbox material. The song is innocuous, the video is KSS, I don't see a problem.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The Scandinavians have some really cool new stars, this week I'am listening to one of them:
Zara Larsson - Weak Heart - YouTube[^]
it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I've listened to a lot of black metal... I'm familiar with Scandinavian's musicians!
And then there's stuff like Vibrasphere, Björk, Trentemøller, Kate Havnevik, Emilíana Torrini...
And of course the many goth- and progmetal!
I've come across Zara Larsson before too, pretty good.
Yeah, Scandinavia is great
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't matter how talented she is, she's still a product.
I had to clean[^] my ears out.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: I had to clean[^] my ears out.
Wow! Status Quo's looking damn good for their age!
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing wrong with that.
The impact Status Quo has had on rock music cannot be overstated.
Just a pity they're tarnishing their legacy with mass producing "Best Of" records.
|
|
|
|