|
Pretty sure nothing of a proxy nature appears anywhere in my systems. I'll double check, and check the modem/router, too, to make sure they haven't "improved" it without telling me.
Still, since it's just this one computer with the problem, it shouldn't be the network. (An identical Win10 box doesn't have any issues.)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: What kind of sense does it make to only allow login if there's a spy on the line? We all behave better when we know someone is watching.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried disabling the firewall and rebooting with it disabled? One of the people at work ran into an issue on Win7 where that was the only way to fix it. Something was preventing a program from binding to a socket that it needed, even though nobody was using it or had it reserved via the registry keys. It was some sort of new issue -- everything has been working fine for them, then poof, suddenly it stopped working fine.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that is something I haven't looked at. Ditto on the everything working fine, then not.
Thanks. We'll see what happens when I get home.
edit: Nope. Didn't fix it.
modified 2-Jun-16 8:38am.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the things I would check is potential DNS problem. Check the contents of your hosts file for example.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Even with an empty HOSTS file, it does it. And it uses the same DNS servers as the other machine that works. I've done the whole \flushdns thing, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uninstall Fiddler and - this is important - WinPCap. I bet you've found an incompatibility.
|
|
|
|
|
You mention Skype...Don't they somehow hijack browser content? (to inject call tags) Could it be a problem with the Skype account? I've seen stranger things... Good luck!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know about that, but...there are here versions of Skype (that I have, anyway). Two "native" Win10 versions, Skype for Business, and Skype Video -- both of which I have no problem logging in to, and the "desktop" version of Skype, which uses the reach out and touch live.com login.
|
|
|
|
|
is to receive a snack upside the head.
|
|
|
|
|
Well I'd just send them to boarding school but heh...
|
|
|
|
|
Food for thought, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
If you order tacos but get tortilla chips, is it nacho lucky day?
Early today, I've got to take herself to the physioterrorist soon
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I toldya Donut joke about food!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try tamale
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
You should burrito that one in the backyard!
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
How to tell how old a map is: xkcd: Map Age Guide[^]
I love the whole "Is it trying to bite you?" branch...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I love the "How sure are you this map is in English"?
|
|
|
|
|
While I've learned to accept the mystery down-voter who awards me -16 points from time to time, often after the OP has accepted my response as "the answer," in QA, here ...
I am surprised, indeed, by what appears to be someone(s) going through many of my recent QA posts and up-voting them.
In case this is one of you (gentle readers), please keep in mind that the criteria I think are valid for voting (up, or, down) for a QA reply is: the technical quality of the solution; its relevance to the OP's concerns; and its over-all usefulness. I would hope that the criteria used by the mystery up-voter(s) are similar.
But, even though I consider myself (attempting to stay) outside the "rep game," I am not complaining
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
It's me. Could you please return the favour?
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe, with all the complain about anonymous down-voters, we breed a new CPian
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, Kornfeld, I think you're right, the effect of Cerenkov radiation's eerie blue light on sperm and eggs probably cannot underestimated.
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry Bill - it was my turn last week!
Seen a couple of instances where a bunch of recent answers from me were all up-voted in the space of a few moments.
My concern was that someone would think I'd created a sock-puppet account!
But like you, I'm not complaining
|
|
|
|