|
Single Step Debugger wrote: But behind the scenes is boiling barely organized chaos... I'm not sure I know what I'm doing Just add "historical growth" to the documentation if you have to hand it out in the future... I have seen / hear that being used as a valid argument for poor design / process the last couple of years. (And I hate it but have to learn to live with it)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I won't tell if you don't...
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I consider that as hitting their spec perfectly! They are probably ecstatic.
Just put in some rendering glitches so that they can point them out to you for correction before you ship.
You probably feel dirty because you copy the entire image to initialize the buffer.(guessing?) Your witch brain is whispering “Why are you copying over all of those regions that did not change?”
|
|
|
|
|
I mean, yeah. I feel like the white out approach is what really gets me. It's not so much the technical end, like, performance of it or anything, it's just - it's goofy. It's messy. And it works flawlessly.
Basically this is e-paper, so I have a 2 second refresh cycle. I can take all the time I need, relatively speaking, to draw a frame, so this is one of those instances where I don't care about the inefficiency of it.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of a full white out approach, it sounds like you could go for 25% transparency so they could see more of the beautiful background image.
(Don’t take the bait!)
|
|
|
|
|
Pff.. some people are still using Windows 10 or 11 over here.. I am going to leave them all in the dust with my new copy of Windows 98! Muahaha!
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 may be better. Less features, less bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Amarnath S wrote: 3.1 may be better. Less features, different bugs. FTFY!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Why not go all out with MS DOS...
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
QDOS comes after that
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
CP/M?
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Yikes that goes way back. I have a copy on a giant 8" floppy disk somewhere. I thought I had a tape cassette with it CP/M but I forget.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
modified 9-May-23 22:53pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure does ... I remember doing networking with Lantastic over coax...
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Used telnet with modem and home phone line. Talked to a mainframe via my IBM PC @1200 baud at first if memory serves. I remember getting my first 9600 baud modem. I think I still have it.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, modems... I looked after a national retail chain of close to 400 stores. I developed a MS-DOS batch file, that had a built-in retry mechanism, that dialled into the stores to collect daily sales information using 300 baud dialup modems and generated a report file that the customer's VAX would read. Those were the good old days ... lol
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
I certainly do not miss worrying about error detection/correction on bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
All sounds familiar.
Our main frame was a VAX (later a VAX cluster) running VMS. MS-DOS batch files, couldn't live without them.
Everything is so much different but somehow no so much.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Found it. anchor automation Volksmodem 12. Put a lot data through it.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Win 3.1 runs on MS DOS, so, two birds and all...
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do. - Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
Amarnath S wrote: 3.1 may be better. Less features, less bugs.
In terms of bug counts, maybe, but in terms of bug severity...it's been a long time I've seen a BSOD in modern Windows versions. 3.1 required multiple reboots a day.
|
|
|
|
|
From what I know, the BSOD problem was there in Win 98 also. Only when Managed code made its presence in the early 2000s, did the BSOD reduce drastically, isn't it?
For example I could write
int *a = 0;
and cause system-crash, till the coming of managed code.
|
|
|
|
|
Amarnath S wrote: From what I know, the BSOD problem was there in Win 98 also
All operating systems have their equivalent to the BSOD, even the latest Windows and Linux versions, and yes, they were still rather common on 98.
I'm not sure the reduction of BSODs can be directly attributed to managed code however...I mean, your null pointer sample will crash a regular app, but shouldn't take down the entire OS. Older versions weren't doing such a great job preventing apps from overwriting memory that doesn't belong to them.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen it fairly recently (or something like it) - perhaps in last two years? Bit scary actually because I hadn't seen it it so long.
And related...
In Las Vegas there is an intersection with MGM, New York and a two other casinos. There are above street crosswalks in all directions for pedestrians. MGM has (or perhaps had) a very large screen facing that intersection. It showed various casino ads and such.
So I was walking on the crosswalk and there was a giant screen of BSOD.
Apparently something similar happened to the Paris casino.
I wonder if one of those sets the record for the largest BSOD.
|
|
|
|
|
Bad drivers can do that, and it's the correct thing for the OS to do as all bets are off.
But a regular end-user app would have a very hard time doing that nowadays, even on purpose.
|
|
|
|