|
Slacker007 wrote: Julian Assange is very credible
How true. Another thing is Assange and his website have never been wrong!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think "meltdown" is a bit of a strong term for it: Someone expressed an unpopular opinion and was fired for it.
The only way this becomes noteworthy is if he wins the anti-discrimination lawsuit, but history holds that he won't.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
Website makes AJAX calls (HTTPS posts) to the server that sends websocket commands to the target client at a specific site which then uses RabbitMQ to update the BeagleBones.
Between my code library (open source), various open source libraries like RabbitMQ, jQuery, Newtonsoft.Json, and websocket-client, and a good application-specific architecture, the communication chain executes around 50 lines of application-specific code from Javascript -> C# (server) -> C# (client) -> Python (BeagleBone).
Amazing.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Any other buzzwords available?
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Any other buzzwords available?
Sometimes its fun to create a little buzz.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
btw, I forgot to click the joke item,sorry
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: I forgot to click the joke item
That should be the default for me.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like Marc's looking for a new job or a new consulting gig. Promoting his resume here subtly.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, he can send me a mail, we are looking always for good architects
Promoting ours interests here subtly
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Have pity on a poor desktop developer who knows next to nothing about web development.
Is 50 lines of code amazing because it's very little, or very much?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's amazing because it works
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: It's amazing because it works
Now if only you could.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Log out and log back in ya big whiner.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Log out and log back in ya big whiner.
Hey, it's Saturday arvo, can't been seen to be doing kind of work ya know.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
So where's my bold and italic tags? Still can't add them back.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Seemingly works is a better way of putting it. That goes for most web/cloud development. Then you hit that super rare race condition and no one can repro it in dev
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Is 50 lines of code amazing because it's very little, or very much?
Because it's very little, and as Chris said, because it works.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
That's a lot of points of failure.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: That's a lot of points of failure.
Yup. Technically, I could set up a websocket between the web server and the BB's directly, thus avoiding two intermediate steps, but that introduces other complications, such as verifying permissions, recovery routines on the BB, and having the BB's notify the local server of state change (everything gets logged to a database), so for now, this is the simplest approach -- as in it took the least amount of code to write -- didn't have to touch the BB code at all because the functionality already existed for remote state management.
Ugh, didn't mean to get into that level of detail.
But the main point is, this is for monitoring BB status remotely and clearing a couple states, the recovery in case of a comm / server failure is straightforward, so if it fails, it's not "mission critical."
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Just a post to say I have completed my first week working for a BIG company and it I think it went well as my Dept Head said to on her way out "Well, Glenn you have been more use this week than I hoped and I have good things from others, Keep up the good work" , I was doing my best not to bump into the funiture and appear busy...
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds good!
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats! May the honeymoon last as long as possible!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks !
|
|
|
|