|
OriginalGriff wrote: ... and it was still legal to beat your wife with a stick (provided it was less than one inch thick).
Fortunately for both sexes, we have moved away from those days...
Gonna have to admit I didn't know it was OK to use a bigger stick now.
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: mostly while being unable to find their own backside with both hands and a map even though having their head stuck in it) FTFY
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No, no - that would prevent them talking out of it!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: That's rather sexist, don't you think? A video about women having trouble filling up? No!!!!!! Don't be so sensitive.
Disclaimer: I don't read or understand German (or whatever it was) but the title at least "Women while refueling" is not sexist at all.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
One wonders why more women don't video them and post on Youtube. Maybe because women actually have better things to do with their time.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: women actually have better things to do with their time. Too busy taking selfies to share, I'd wager!
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot the time they need to practice the proper expression [^] for the selfies.
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: because women actually have better things to do with their time.
Absolutely, it's far better for all that they get the cooking and cleaning done
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
Fist time I saw this happen, a male friend of mine was the driver. We made a lot of laughs about it later. Was that sexist as well, or is it sexist only when a female is laughed at?
|
|
|
|
|
Member 7989122 wrote: Was that sexist as well
No, it wasn't sexist, it was funny.
But posting it up to youtube with a collection of other people of the same sex and give it a title like "Women while refueling" would be, because the implication is that this is how women will do it.
There are few enough women in this industry - and even fewer here - partly because of postings like this. Would it be acceptable to single out a different group for a similar collection? Disabled people perhaps? Indians? Rednecks? Muslims? Heck, you'd get shouted down if you did one with just ginger haired people!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: There are few enough women in this industry - and even fewer here - partly because of postings like this. That's ridiculous.
Could it be that most of them are just way to cool to play with the nerds? They simply have zero interest in this kind of work.
Then there are those who heard that you can earn good money with this kind of work. When I studied, we started out in the first semester with a healthy ratio of something like 20:1. Most I knew tried this in hope of a well paid job, but over time they all gave up. Nobody scared them away. It was their lack of interest that made them quit. They were bored to death. Math, data structures, algorithm, assembly, hardware up and down, how to write a compiler, databases - all not very sexy.
In the end we had only very few left who obviously had found something that kept their attention beyond the prospect of getting a good job some day.
Cuddle them all you want, it will not change very much.
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
Well said Paul
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't this thread approaching soapbox territory?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
They say that the next big thing is Deep Learning. But what lies beneath that?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Well obviously: Even Deeper Learning (via Google)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Low level code?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Thought, obviously. And the answer (SPOILER!) is 42.
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
Life is more than playing chess.
Besides, we have learned a lot since Deep Thought was the big thing.
Actually, I don't know which is highest ranked nowadays.
We have enough entertainment watching Magnus Carlsen.
|
|
|
|
|
Now you got me. I actually meant this one here, which the chess computer was named after:
Quote: Deep Thought is a computer that was created by the pan-dimensional, hyper-intelligent species of beings (whose three-dimensional protrusions into our universe are ordinary white mice) to come up with the Answer to The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. Deep Thought is the size of a small city. When, after seven and a half million years of calculation, the answer finally turns out to be 42, Deep Thought admonishes Loonquawl and Phouchg (the receivers of the Ultimate Answer) that "[she] checked it very thoroughly, and that quite definitely is the answer. I think the problem, to be quite honest with you is that you've never actually known what the question was."
Deep Thought does not know the ultimate question to Life, the Universe and Everything, but offers to design an even more powerful computer, Earth, to calculate it. After ten million years of calculation, the Earth is destroyed by Vogons five minutes before the computation is complete.
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
I think you mean Deep Blue.
That was a big thing when it beat Kasparov decades ago, and it had nothing to do with deep learning. Today there is a lotta hype about "deep learning", perhaps more so in the financial press than the technical.
But I agree: watching Carlsen and those guys is always entertaining.
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Thought was a successor of Deep Blue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What if C-A-T really spelled dog?
|
|
|
|