|
sorry for the late reply
I love SF and highly recommend it. I used it for ~ 1 year and half. I will talk about the first version, a new one will soon complement it (without discontinuing the 1st)
You can build highly scalable (planet scale) and reliable apps with just C# , visual studio (integrates perfectly) and an azure subscription. Containers are optional but you can do without.
you need approximately 1 week to get started (the doc is excellent) 2 weeks start tinkering and 1 month to start being productive
SF enforces some interesting paradigms to write better microservices apps . I love their reliable actors paradigm.
The new version will target a "Serverless" approach so it will be quite different and containers here are required. I have not yet studied it but I'm sure the team will make a great work as usual.
There is a great team with nice people, always ready to support the community, they do a monthly meeting, you could join to have a look (but community makes deep tech questions)
Go for it
Antonio
|
|
|
|
|
AReady wrote: you need approximately 1 week to get started (the doc is excellent) 2 weeks start tinkering and 1 month to start being productive I need it implemented yesterday
AReady wrote: The new version will target a "Serverless" approach so it will be quite different and containers here are required Interesting! Do you know what this version is called?
|
|
|
|
|
|
AReady wrote: it's called Service fabric mesh Cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd forgotten about that one ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's a brilliant ironic spam.
[Edit]Removed the phone number from your title as this was doing their advertising for them. PO'H
I'd rather be phishing!
modified 4-Jul-18 8:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
Please remove the phone number from the subject
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
done (by someone else).
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
'Twas me.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
upvoted because of spelling …
|
|
|
|
|
I see that UK bookies are offering a miserly 4-1 (5.0 if you prefer decimal odds) on England to win the World Cup.
Just curious as to how much this is effected by the "patriotic pound" - what price can you get on an England victory in less biased parts of the world?
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
4 to1 is 80% chance, ain't it ? That's quite optimistic. I would have said 0.1%, e.g. someone eventually breaks a body part of their choice of Neymar - so that all that faking comes true - in case they would stand a infinitesimal chance to beat Brazil on their way.
|
|
|
|
|
Surely, you can't be suggesting that Neymar would ever indulge in a spot of acting?
4-1 is a 20% chance, by the way - still a massive overstatement of our chances.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: Neymar would ever indulge in a spot of acting?
Noooo[^] ! Never ever [^] !
PeejayAdams wrote: 4-1 is a 20% chance, by the way
It depends[^]
|
|
|
|
|
The odds are a reflection of the amount of money being bet on England to win and not based on the real possibility of this happening. As a large part of England is currently going football mad the amount of money being bet on an England win must be rising incrementally.
The bookies have to be careful they make a profit out of this.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, yes, the effect is always visible on markets for national teams and never more so than with football.
My suspicion is that there's a very healthy living to be made from simply laying against wins for your national teams and sporting icons, but I'm also pondering the notion of cross-border matched betting - e.g. I lay England in England at a really low price and someone in another country (let's say Spain) backs them at a more realistic one creating a pretty huge arbitrage. We'd then reverse the process if say, Rafa Nadal is playing.
I'm just curious as to how large the effect is, my suspicion is that it's massive - I'd have thought that England would be more realistically priced at somewhere around 15.0, so would love to know what's happening on the exchanges around the world.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Team Odds
Brazil $3.85
France $5.00
England $5.00
Belgium $7.00
Croatia $7.00
Uruguay $15.00
Russia $17.00
Sweden $26.00
current TAB.com.au market
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! That's rather curious, pretty much the same prices for all sides as I'm seeing in England at the moment - do Aussie bookies trade on the UK exchanges?
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
TAB isn't, but a lot of the other big bookies here are offshoots of UK operators. Ladbrokes springs to mind. They all look over each others' shoulders of course, particularly with odds posted online.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
There are certainly many bookies here who use multiple brands - groups of several sites that carry exactly the same prices.
As for looking over shoulders, I've always loved watching race course bookies (particularly back in the day of chalk-boards, tic-tac and no mobiles). They say that information can't travel faster than the speed of light, but it can!
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|