|
It's funny you should say that ... so is mine ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, that was a good heads-up.
It looks like they have some interesting games, so they may well actually get some cash out of me, so it is win-win for me and gog.
|
|
|
|
|
With just 14 days left to go in our Docker Challenge, the survey responses continue to roll in. The most popular response to the weirdest use of Docker continues to be: Running Docker within Docker. What do you think? Take our 30 second Docker survey and help us reach our charity goal of $1,500. Vote today!
|
|
|
|
|
Jovita Dsa wrote: the weirdest use of Docker continues to be: Running Docker within Docker
Is that like putting 10 pounds of crap into a 5-pound bag?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
So is the Docker Challenge to try and figure out what it does?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Roland, the idea is to get those who are unfamiliar with and curious about Docker to try it out. And as with all our contests, to have some fun in the process
|
|
|
|
|
It’s much more fun to mock the flawed technology.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
We have never mocked any technology here. Ever.
|
|
|
|
|
I often regret that we moved to TFS but saving that big $7 a month over GitHub was, strangely, enough to keep me there.
I think I can pony up $7 a month not to be locked out of my own code. Which is such a ridiculous statement to have to make.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Last of the big spenders, you!
No, that's stupid - TFS is run by people who are supposed to be "Cloud aware", and who certainly should know exactly what you - and I, and all 13, 718, 609 other members - want, need, and expect of a source control system. And they can't keep it up*? Not a good reflection on Azure really, considering how they see TFS as a stepping stone to Azure DevOps.
* Fnnr, fnnr - added to keep MM amused.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: and all 13, 718, 609 other members - want, need, and expect of a source control system.
Well, as 7.289368769093135e-8 of that, that's why I use GitHub.
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
I too.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That is until Microsoft integrate it into their systems more
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Only seven dollars a month to get an occasional day off? Where do I sign up?
(We're using TFS and not having trouble. --Yet-- We're being forced to move to a centralized enterprise TFS, then all heck will break out I'm sure.)
|
|
|
|
|
How much are you actually saving? Are you paying for license to host your own server? Are you paying for Microsoft to provide you TFS? Either of those options seem like they would cost more than $7/mo (particularly licensing TFS, which I just looked up, ranging between $45 to $250 / month, but you can never a straight answer from Microsoft on how much something costs, given the options listed just on that page.
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that it was down for us for the second day in a row has already negated a years worth of ‘savings’
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Did you get the "no privilege" error? If so, did a simple re-connect fix the issue? I experienced a couple of hiccups yesterday, but nothing that prevented me from continuing to work.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
It was the full "Service is down" page.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Just wait for some politically active 22 year old who decides s/he doesn't like your politics so s/he shuts you down or deletes your data.
Cloud hosting is a nice idea. That's it, just a nice idea.
|
|
|
|
|
And didn't Microsoft buy GitHub ???
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Regrettably, yes ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So, stop relying on centralized services.
Git works decentralized.
We're using Mercurial at my job, it's filebased, if you want it centralized you just put a repo on the fileserver and access it via VPN if needed.
But you don't even need a server, just start the builtin webserver.
Or in worst case, put the repo on a memorystick and pass it around. Not that I recommend it, mind you.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I think I can pony up $7 a month not to be locked out of my own code.
I've always called this situation "companies taking your data hostage" and this really makes it seem true.
Well, we may as well laugh, because if it isn't funny, it's quite bad.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure we work in vastly different ways. I've been able to use TFS's offline mode for a few days in the past, and when going back online, it just "did the right thing" on its own to reconsolidate everything it had detected had been changed since.
|
|
|
|
|
The issue for us is Matthew and I are both make some extensive changes to the code in tandem and so we are constantly checking in and syncing our changes to ensure everything's dovetailing nicely. Something like this is a bit of a buzz kill because now our changes build up as commits and then when it comes back online the chances of conflicts (or worse: one of us going down the wrong path) is higher.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|