|
It looks really interesting, and I want to use it, but it's experimental status keeps me from doing so.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I think I replied to something similar a bit back, but for the record...
Blazor's big advantage is that you get to use the same language on client and server and it's a real language, not a toy language. Those two things in and of themselves should make everything else obsolete for the most part, IMO. And of course they are getting ever closer to a practical WASM based client, which makes it even more appealing.
It's pretty easy to use and to create new components. It is HTML/CSS based ultimately, which sucks, but that is an equally distinct suckage quotient for pretty much all its competitors so it's a wash in terms of comparisons.
It's pretty straightforward to dynamically generate content, though it has limitations in terms of component inheritance wrt to component containment, which kind of sucks and they apparently don't care enough about that to do anything about it since they silently closed my issue last week on the matter.
It has a quite flexible embedded code/data in HTML scheme that makes it pretty easy to just embed references to component members and have them become part of the HTML, or to easily generate HTML content in place with code snippets. And/or you can have 'code behind' for much more complex processing.
However, because it's HTML based but it's sort of 'double buffered' in that they maintain their own hierarchy and go from that to HTML, changes can't really automatically show up. You have to force a refresh in lots of cases to get that to happen, and it's easy to miss places where you need to do that.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client-server is back!
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then".
― Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like all the demo pages are pretty slow to load. Painful even (although slightly more bearable on subsequent loads). Is that an artifact of the framework itself?
|
|
|
|
|
I would guess this demo page is poorly written.... and also maybe, use an early version...
Anyhow from the behavior (slow first load, fater subsequent load) I would guess these demo have lots of large DLLs to download to run. And DLLs are downloaded only once though...
Press F12 and look at network statistics...
|
|
|
|
|
After my morning black kaphy I thought to myself...
What about ghoti and chips today, hey?!
|
|
|
|
|
Ghoti is an artificial word used to illustrate irregularities in English spelling. It is a respelling of the word fish: i.e., it is supposed to be pronounced /ˈfɪʃ/. It is made of these phonemes: gh, pronounced /f/ as in tough /tʌf/;
modified 17-Apr-19 19:45pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Ghoti is a dish best served raw.
|
|
|
|
|
Or cooked in lime juice....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAAUUUGH!! My digital world is collapsing!
The best way to improve Windows is run it on a Mac.
The best way to bring a Mac to its knees is to run Windows on it.
~ my brother Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
My Samsung made me broke!
well...
or would've, had I been that stoopid
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, at least it hasn't exploded[^] ... that's a good sign, isn't it?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OTOH, the stuff produced by their weapons division doesn't explode.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
And?
Did "early adopter" suddenly start meaning something other than "worst kind of sucker" while I wasn't looking?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
...are becoming more annoying than the ads.
I'm referring to various sites other than CP, many are news sites, and many don't even let you continue with the ad-blocker in place unless you subscribe. As the saying goes, nothing is free.
We need a blocker for the "you're using an ad-blocker!"
Latest Article - A 4-Stack rPI Cluster with WiFi-Ethernet Bridging
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
...these news sites...
And why you expect they have the capabilities to deliver all for free?
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: And why you expect they have the capabilities to deliver all for free? Selling cookies.
So why is there still a need to sell ads? I wouldn't mind a single short ad, as the news-service here does, but most sites are stuffing in as much as they can get.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
That argument only holds if the ads have an effect - i.e. they make me spend money on some service or product. If I am presented for a hundred ads in, say, Thai, it is just a waste of bits and pixels - it makes no sense to me. It is just garbage. So I want it off my screen.
Same with US companies selling US products/services on the US market: Even though I can read the English words, I would never have any reason to react to the ad. So it is garbage, in a similar way.
You could say "But the news site gets paid for throwing a pile of garbage on your doorstep" - it is none of their business that it is of no intererst to you". Nevertheless, all that garbage annoys me. I can't even consider it product/market "information"; it is not avilable to me.
My reactions to "relevant" ads are quite different from all those irrelvant ads. Proposals like "People who bought that product you are looking at, also bought so-and-so" may actually be fine.
Also, I think paying for access to news articles is fine. But I see references to at least fifty different news sites a day, maybe a hundred over a week. I cannot pay a hundred subscriptions! But if there was some sort of syndication, maintaining a single account for me, and whenever I read an article on one of the syndicated news sites, a small amount (half a USD? one USD for in-depth articles?) would be charged to this account. But I see not traces of such a mechanism coming up.
But I ask myself: Why don't we have browsers that pretend (to the web site) that they show the ads, but simply "forget" to display them on the screen? It would certainly be technically possible to return exactly the same response to the web site, whether the ad was displayed or not.
|
|
|
|