|
I started in 1983 (high school), and my favorite anecdote is still the time I crashed the school's PDP-11 by filling the disk with the log file of a depth-first maze solver.
Good times.
|
|
|
|
|
So?
Tell us.
modified 23-Dec-19 15:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
From the "Santa Hat Icon in VS Code Creates 'SantaGate,' Locks Down Repository" item from the Daily CP newsletter:
Quote: The Santa Hat on vscode insiders and pushing of religion is very offensive to me,
How is Santa "pushing religion"? Santa as a symbol for crass consumerism, absolutely, but I don't know what religion promotes Santa or how Santa promotes any particular religion.
All my life in fact I've kept hearing from members of all religions commiserating the fact that Santa is twisting the entire message around "the Holidays". Sounds like another case of a sourpuss of a snowflake getting triggered and taking offensive only to be part of some movement.
[Edit]
Re: the "no religion" rule: My entire point is that this is not a religion issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Note that Bob isn't wearing a Santa hat.
His headwear is a facsimile of cosmic-ray screens worn by early canine-type astronauts in his world, and is worn to commemorate the first orbital flight which didn't explode and spread millions of pieces of dog-like animal throughout his planet's stratosphere -- so it's not religious at all.
The bobble on the end of the protective wear (not the top) provided a filter for the pseudo-canines' nose-like organs -- but Bob obviously can't wear it that way around, because his head is not alien-creature-almost-like-a-dog shaped.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So as an avid animal rights protester I have to complain that Bob is celebrating the use of animals in dangerous situations. STOP THE ABUSE!
(Where’s my safe space?)
I, for one, like Roman Numerals.
|
|
|
|
|
It may stem from a precursor of Santa being a religious individual. The current depiction of Santa isn't supposed to be bound to any particular belief system, but being from the Southern US, I do see it happen often enough. I can see why it's misunderstood.
The National Geographic has a nice history of Santa article that's worth a look.
|
|
|
|
|
Santa ... didn't he get bought out by Coca-Cola?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Santa ... didn't he get bought out by Coca-Cola? Not Coca Cola. I believe he's the new CEO of Boeing. He must have bought out Boeing. I suspect it went cheap!
|
|
|
|
|
What Americans think Santa looks like is primarily based on old Coke advertisements.
|
|
|
|
|
Roland M Smith wrote: Coke advertisements.
First they took over Santa (being responsible for his modern-day image), next it was polar bears.
Notice how they've dropped the oh-so-cute polar bears ever since people are now supposed to feel sad about them.
|
|
|
|
|
Obligatory xkcd: Duty Calls
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
More appropriate?
[^]
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: "Bah! Humbug!" Ebenezer Scrooge
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Time to spruce the house up, with some tree-mendous decorations – fir sure!
TotD will be shutting down for a few days - probably* - and reappear on or before the 7th Jan. Probably.
This is Wales. Where you do still hear shop conversations like:
"When are you shtting for Christmas?"
"Well, I've still got half a dozen of these left, so if they sell today, then today. Otherwise, could be next week."
"And when are you reopening?"
"Oh. ... Um. ... January.
...
Probably."
* - Maybe tomorrow it'll shut down. Not sure yet.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
January? People will pine for the ToTD before then.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I may be going out on a limb with this, but what sap said you can take off from TotD?
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not emotionally attached to the franchise, so I liked it a lot.
YMMV.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
#realJSOP wrote: I'm not emotionally attached to the franchise
Is that why people hate everything from the prequels onward?
I haven't seen it yet myself, but despite that, I can also say I like it a lot--but that's only because it means they're finally putting that thing to rest.
(wishful thinking, I know...)
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like episodes 1 or 2 - I think they were just crappy movies. Episode 3 wasn't too god-awful bad. Of course, the latest movies are better in terms of special effects, but the CGI replacement characters still creep me out a little.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
+1 Possibly one of the more honest reviews out there. 42 years is quite an amazing history. (not the word I was looking for, but the nog. It's strong this year).
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
What drove me nuts was the almost 30 minutes of commercials. Showtime was 4:45 PM, the movie didn't actually start until 5:15 PM. I will never go to a Regal Cinemas showing again.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Showtime was 4:45 PM, the movie didn't actually start until 5:15 PM At which point my popcorn and soda are history, and I'm quickly approaching second stage of REM sleep. I agree with you though, start times should be the actual start times.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
It has given my son and I plenty about which to argue. We do agree that it should have been split into two movies. I feel that there are some scenes which seemed rushed and incomplete -- maybe the blu-ray will have them expanded.
However, there is only one Star Wars and it was released in 1977.
modified 23-Dec-19 13:32pm.
|
|
|
|
|
If you hate it, remember that George Lucas wanted episodes 7-9 to be about the Midichlorians and another microscopic entity called The Whills.
|
|
|
|
|
Just as well they took the franchise away from him...
|
|
|
|