|
kmoorevs wrote: thriving and still evolving. It's been a good ride! Exactly, on any given day I might write in C, C++, Assembler (8, 16, & 32 bit), and some C#. Doing PC based stuff and embedded stuff. I've maintained some code for at least 25 years. It keeps you on your toes.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I'm hard to forget, some will probably not be able to even with constant therapy. Actually, it's only my last boss who could need some therapy, which also is why I left there. The others already gave me something like that when I left and they are quite good. That will have to suffice. Running back with anybody's survey ia a joke.
I wonder if that's a sneaky trap. Anyone who can contact 5 former bosses changes his employment more often than some people their underwear. And that's not a good thing at all.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your input. I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
Do the managers have to be her "direct report" managers or could they be managers of other groups that she may have interfaced with? Maybe managers of customers, vendors, etc...?
|
|
|
|
|
Good question. Based on the survey they are people who do know what she did day-to-day and what she was like in her role. But she has only had 4 jobs in her life anyways (since she is still young) so that makes it difficult also.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would any of those - managers of customers, vendors, etc. - want to complete a detailed survey, even if they felt qualified to "judge" an employee of a different company?
I wouldn't. But then, I don't fill out surveys unless I can see something in it for me: I value my time higher than the survey setters do ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Why would any of those - managers of customers, vendors, etc. - want to complete a detailed survey Because they're compassionate human beings?
I've been a reference (ie. spoken to potential employers or recruiters) for several people who did not directly report to me.
|
|
|
|
|
And so have I.
Writing a letter of reference is one thing - and I'm happy to do it for people I know - but a detailed survey? That's just rude - you can bet that their HR department would just throw such a request in the bin.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: but a detailed survey? That's just rude We'll have to agree to disagree. A properly designed survey might take less time than writing a reference letter that doesn't sound like a boilerplate.
|
|
|
|
|
fgs1963 wrote: Because they're compassionate human beings?
Did not know these still existed in the work milieu.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point!
Maybe I've been blessed. In 39 years in the work force (35 at my current employer) I've had a total of 7 managers. 5 were excellent. I'm sure they would have gone out of their way to give a good reference to anyone they felt deserved it. I've been a manager myself (small groups) for nearly 20 years. Having learned from these managers - I do the same.
Based on many of the responses to your OP... I feel very alone.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Because they're compassionate human beings?
I have only met 2 "Compassionate Human Beings" in my 72 years. One is my wife of 48+ years(Not just to me she is a Registered Nurse and cares deeply for her patients), and the other was my Mother-in-Law, and she has pasesd away. Neither of them are/were in IT.
I must admit that I, myself am not.
I will admit to being an extreme cynic.
Except for a couple of contracts, I have worked for myself sinve 1977. I could give me a "great Reference"
ed
|
|
|
|
|
Slow Eddie wrote: I have only met 2 "Compassionate Human Beings" in my 72 years. Damn... harsh.
Slow Eddie wrote: Neither of them are/were in IT. Neither am I. Maybe engineers are just nicer that IT folks.
Slow Eddie wrote: I will admit to being an extreme cynic. Ya think?
|
|
|
|
|
This. This would set off a huge red flag for me that BigCo is likely a terrible bureaucracy with which I wouldn't want to be affiliated.
|
|
|
|
|
It may also be a way for the new company to get contact information for middle-managers at the former employers, so they can try to market products and services to them.
|
|
|
|
|
Everything is marketing!!
It's marketing all the way down...
|
|
|
|
|
Since she already did the work, she could take the "assertive" approach, and say she is thankful for their response, that she has 2 references as is normal (or whatever), and that their time is too limited to take surveys but they welcome a call.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: that she has 2 references as is normal (or whatever), and that their time is too limited to take surveys
That's a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
When I was a manager (previous life), we would only verify employment.
>64
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
theoldfool wrote: When I was a manager (previous life), we would only verify employment.
SUPER UPVOTE!!!
This makes sense to me, since humans' opinions can vary simply by how much sleep they got the previous night and if they are nutritionally deprived -- see judges grant fewer paroles[^] when they are tired and hungry.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: Would you be able to provide 3 Managers from your past that you could be confident would give you good responses?
Nope. They're either dead or retired. Seriously.
And the living ones are for the most part the ones I gave the finger to, so they wouldn't be good references.
|
|
|
|
|
So being on good terms with you is the kiss of death?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: And the living ones are for the most part the ones I gave the finger to, so they wouldn't be good references
Thank you for being so honest. I am in the same situation.
|
|
|
|
|
I have actually been asked once to get reports, not surveys, about my performance from my last three employers, which I thought was a strange request here (in Portugal). Note that they did not want a report from my direct boss/manager but from my employer, who probably never even heard of me!
Worse, they wanted the report to have a minimum of five pages
I told them no. Not because I couldn't but because too much time had passed. In the end I still got the job because I was the most qualified
To answer your poll, I believe my former managers would have mostly good things to say about me because we still keep in touch once in a while
It is possible that BigCo. wants to use the survey to ditch most candidates in an automated way, possibly using AI (it is the latest fashion after all), but I think that they are using the wrong approach.
I agree with you. It is ridiculous. Someone that can present a lot of surveys either had many short jobs or was bad at their jobs.
Just for reference, I don't usually deliver a letter either. I only submit my short curriculum (three to five pages where two of them are my data). The only time I really had to supply a "Motivation letter" (a long time ago) I wrote something like "Tell me what I will be working on, then I tell you if I am motivated because just telling me 'C++ programmer' is the worst motivational phrase"
And I got the job
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for responding. Very interesting.
ElectronProgrammer wrote: It is possible that BigCo. wants to use the survey to ditch most candidates in an automated way, possibly using AI (it is the latest fashion after all), but I think that they are using the wrong approach.
This may indeed be the entire thing.
|
|
|
|