|
The real disservice was done by the hardware designers.
|
|
|
|
|
reminds me of the project where I bit-banged 16, 150 baud serial ports on parallel interface to communicate with the pin sensors on an automatic bowling lane scoring system.
Worked great on the Dev system, but would not work in Production.
Spent days trying to figure it out, gave up, slammed the stack of fan-fold paper list closed in discussed.
Looked down at the first line and realized I hadn't initialized the stack pointer, which was done automatically on the Dev system.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I still don't know what was causing the issue with the first screen in one of my apps going wonky on my old RA8875 driver implementation. Subsequent screens worked fine, but even when I put in a "fill" to try to force "a new screen" first it still didn't work.
The actually drawing code for the screen is battle tested.
Anyway, rewriting the driver the other day fixed it.
Feels a bit like putting something back together, it working, and having parts left over.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Feels a bit like putting something back together, it working, and having parts left over. Reminds me of a class in college where the professor was a complete prick. The 2nd half of his final exam gave you a list of around 50-60 8085 assembly language instructions. The problem was to write a routine which accepted certain arguments in specific registers and did a particular thing. You were allowed to use each instruction from the list only once. My original solution used only about 40 of the instructions. Since I had plenty of time, I figured out another solution that used all of the instructions exactly once.
When he was grading my final project, he was going to flunk me because I wasn't finished. He relented and decided to look at my exam scores. I had a perfect score on the midterm, and a perfect score on the final. I was one of only three people to get the 2nd half correct.
He was somewhat indignant when I told him I'd been writing 8085 assembly language for two years at that point . I got a C in the course.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gosh that reminds me of my first pro-gig when I got hired at microsoft at like 18? (maybe i was 19 i don't remember)
One of the people on the team did not like that i didn't go to school. The thing is I coded rings around him. I think he didn't like that either.
I ended up moving on to bigger and better things, but not before I either earned his respect or our PM told him to back off some. I'll never know which and don't care. =)
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
not sure if athletic analogy applies, but no pain, no gain.
|
|
|
|
|
always admired your passion!
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
At index 6852777[^] if you work Pi out in base 27. However, there are 5 of him hiding in there ...
I'm only in there once - I am indeed unique - at index 24000347.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, I didn't find STEPHAN in pi..
I searched 31415929 digits of pi, and didn't find STEPHAN. Sorry.
This is not at all surprising! About 99.8% of 7 letter names don't occur in the first 31415929 digits. Hmm. I think I saw STEPHA though. Would you like me to search for STEPHA? Or try your initials or a nickname...
You are the 608056th pi searcher overall, and the 49th to search for STEPHAN (Since October 20th, 2008).
|
|
|
|
|
I don't exist either
Quote: You are the 608099th pi searcher overall, and the 21st to search for CARSTEN (Since October 20th, 2008).
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty certain that if you go far enough, you'll find any name you look for in Pi. If this were not the case, it would be a proof that the digits of Pi were non-random.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Now find your life story in pi. It's in there, somewhere.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a really swell idea. Someone should probably make a movie.
|
|
|
|
|
Not so unique apparently
Quote: I searched 31415929 digits of pi, and found RICK 54 times. The first occurrence was at position 864978
|
|
|
|
|
My wife isn't in pi and I was the First one to search for her name.
I am the only person in our house whose name is in pi.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone help me with this i am getting this warning message.
on this line of code
SqlString.Format(_T("SELECT User_Name FROM nurse_login.nurse WHERE User_Name = '%s", (LPCWSTR)str));
Here SqlString is a cstring class object and nurse login is a table from nurse database where str is also a Cstring object.
whenever i try to run the code it give me error of not Access vioalating reading. please help me with it.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the wrong place to ask this, as it says at teh top of the page.
Please try again, posting your question here: http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/ask.aspx[^] and you should get a broader spectrum on answerers, and hopefully a sensible answer.
But when you do, please try to give as much info as you can on the problem and what you are trying to do to fix it, why that doesn't work and so forth: Remember that we can't see your screen, access your HDD, or read your mind - so we only get what you tell us to work on! The better the info you give us, the better the solution we can give you.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Not to mention anything about that big juicy SQL injection opportunity he's got in there...
|
|
|
|
|
Wall climbed as I corner part of the market. (7)
|
|
|
|
|
RAMPART?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That's all I can come up with
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Half of MARKET as an anagram (di=unno what is the indicator) with PART for a wall. But the rest? No idea ...
Hopefully, I'm wrong.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes but he mentions part in the clue - why is ram I corner ?
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
You are up tomorrow!
Sorry for the late response, I dozed off.
Here is how I envisioned the solution:
Corner TRAP
Part of the MARket
Climbed Went up (reverse) TRAPMAR
Wall == RAMPART
So, let's see if I have this right. Yesterday I won because no one got the solution but it was a failure because my clue was invalid. Today I lose because my puzzle was solved and that is success. No wonder these are so hard!
So, better clue today?
(Edited to fix spacing)
modified 29-Mar-22 5:35am.
|
|
|
|