|
Just read the CCC rules on OG's profile - asking for a posting at 9 am London Time. Oi indeed! That's still yesterday almost!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 291 4/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Same for me:
Wordle 291 4/6
🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 291 6/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Phew, got two more letters on that fifth try (giving me four letters to work with)
|
|
|
|
|
Pure - and wild - guessing... First ever under 4...
Wordle 291 2/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Odd guess at early stage? I try to eliminate as many letters as quickly as possible...
Wordle 291 5/6
🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟦⬜⬜
⬜🟦⬜⬜⬜
🟦🟧🟦⬜🟧
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
|
|
|
|
|
DerekT-P wrote: Odd guess at early stage?
Sometimes I feel like that - to make it more interesting... and a very similar word was in my mind all morning...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 291 6/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
5/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
It wasn't difficult but I got sidetracked by my choice of starting words. Anyway, I solved it, period.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
This one was easy.
Wordle 291 3/6*
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
No it wasn’t. “easy” is only 4 letters!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 291 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 291 5/6
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛🟩
⬛⬛🟨⬛🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
User controls in UWP and WPF have a top, left, width and height; and an implied angle of zero degrees.
So I can move them around by altering the top, left coordinates with code at run time.
My user controls have "facings": front (top), back (bottom), left, right. I get to "face" them in different directions by rotating them around a center point.
Rotating the controls has NO effect on the original coordinates (though the "visual" rotates), so I have to calculate (matrix transform) the rotated coordinates myself for collision detection etc.; and reference the original coordinates when I want to move.
In effect, I almost wind up working with 2 controls at the same time; with only the center points in common.
My OCD question is: what would you call the "first" user control versus the second, rotated one?
I'm at "actual" and "visual" but not quite satisfied.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry... "Got a programming question?"
|
|
|
|
|
It's a "terminology" question.
Quote: The body of terms used with a particular technical application in a subject of study, profession, etc.
"the terminology of semiotics"
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm,
Are you referring to 'world' versus 'local' coordinate systems? I think that's the terminology you are looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
They "both" have the same coordinate system. Until the control is rotated, everything corresponds. Once you rotate it, the "visual" no longer corresponds to the coordinates of the "actual"; only code can derive it.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is the nomenclature for the end user or for you as the implementer? If for you then maybe pure/virtual or absolute/relative works better? If for the end-user then maybe fixed and realitve?
Keep Calm and Carry On
|
|
|
|
|
It's for me; coding. One set of methods works on the actual coordinates; another set "shadows" and translates the visual to the actuals required to move it, etc.
2 names (2 ways) to look at the same object.
But it's also a "pattern" (IMO); so, it would also be useful in discussing UWP and WPF user control animation: what you see is not what gets coded.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Just to add to the confusion: is this 2-D or 3-D?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Object local coordinate space transformations relative to the world/global space use the same terminology in both 2D[^] an 3D[^] API.
But I'm not exactly sure if that's what he's asking. It seems that he wants to name the objects. I think Tom and Jerry are good names.
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: I think Tom and Jerry are good names. I'm a Fred, Barney, Wilma, Betty, Pebbles, BamBam, Dino, Hoppy, and Gazoo man myself.
Software Zen: delete this;
modified 5-Apr-22 21:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like the old joke of the person who had to set his password to 8 characters, so he set it to "BashfulDocDopeyGrumpyHappySleepySneezySnowWhite"
|
|
|
|