|
I have it in VS2012. I can send you the files you want.
There are (for HTML):
* HTML5
* HTML 4.01
* XHTML5
* XHTML Frameset
* XHTML Strict 1.1
* XHTML Transitional
There are also the following:
* ASAX
* ASP Head Content
* i18Languages (whatever that is)
* SVG
* XLink
* XML
There are also two .tlb files: w3c-dom1.tlb and w3c-dom1-strict.tlb. I don't know what those are for (DOM Parsing?)
Also, do you have the Web Developer option installed? That may be where these come from.
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: I have it in VS2012. I can send you the files you want.
I found them in the Program Files (x86) folder. Thanks very much though for your offer!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
For me it is in \Program Files (x86) folder.
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\Common7\Packages\schemas\html
|
|
|
|
|
Yusuf wrote: For me it is in \Program Files (x86) folder.
Ah yes, found it there. Thanks!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
There is no single HTML definition, there are many: one for each version of HTML and XHTML. Each of these definitions has an official, W3 sanctioned document type definition file. These dtd files are used in every properly formatted DOCTYPE declaration. These can easily be converted to xsd; in fact, the W3 has a Perl script that will do just that[^].
It seems to me that all you need to do is find the DOCTYPE declaration for the version of (X)HTML that interests you, and convert it. Easy peasy.
|
|
|
|
|
beat me to it..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Marty wrote: You can convert the DTD to XSD directly through a tool from w3.org:
Very cool. Thank you!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
HTML is a SGML spec which has elements that can't be represented in XSD. XHTML was an attempt to build an XSD'able spec.
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Brummer wrote: HTML is a SGML spec which has elements that can't be represented in XSD. XHTML was an attempt to build an XSD'able spec.
Well, I'm only looking for close, not perfect. Thanks for info, I'll explore XHTML.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
This guy called in a bomb hoax[^] because he had forgotten to book the wedding venue!
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
That means that the anti-ter'r'rist squad had to spend a whole half day not sitting on their arses!
The poor dears!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Quite frankly I can't blame him, I'll take the cops over a mad Mrs. any day.
|
|
|
|
|
What a class-A knob!
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one who thinks this plan was genius?
His only mistake was in failing to hold his nerve under questioning.
Maybe his missus was giving him so much grief after he came back he fancied a short stay in prison too.
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
Gangsters only go to jail because they want to.
|
|
|
|
|
Texas. 'Nuff said.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been using DevExpress CodeRush for a few days now, and I really like it. It makes finding possible errors easy, and has a lot of useful code generation options, like create missing constructors for custom exceptions.
How many people here use/have used CodeRush, and what was your experience with it.
I am currently using version 13.1.7.
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
I used it for a while. It's refactoring and suggestions were reasonably ok but what really put me off it was the amount of refactoring "chatter". That is, the popups and code suggestions took up so much space they got in the way of the code. To be honest, I think it probably does or can do things better than Resharper which I use but CodeRush was too much in your face and cluttered the IDE. On balance, RS's IDE is much "quieter".
I reported my observations to the DE team. Whether anything changed, I don't know.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
SeptimusHedgehog 151576 wrote: what really put me off it was the amount of refactoring "chatter". That is, the popups and code suggestions took up so much space they got in the way of the code.
That's one of the reasons I like it! It lets me see what it's going to do. Also pop-ups at the bottom right of the screen are finely placed for me. I prefer its in-screen painting to ReSharper's modal dialogs, but this is a matter of taste.
I don't know when you last used CR. However, most of the stuff you object to can be disabled in options. But I admit it can take a while to find out how! Also, recent versions install in "friction-free" mode by default which means you see almost nothing.
The trouble with these tools is they take a while to tame and probably many devs don't have the time.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Sage words, Kevin. I last used CR around June last year. It was included in the DE licence we had for their Winforms components.
Kevin McFarlane wrote: The trouble with these tools is they take a while to tame and probably many devs don't have the time
That's no maybe. My biggest problem with RS is they have too many options. Like CR the tweaking can be overwhelming.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
SeptimusHedgehog 151576 wrote: My biggest problem with RS is they have too many options. Like CR the tweaking can be overwhelming.
Lol, I've gotten used to it now I think. I did have a problem when, having gotten used to CR, I then worked in a contract where they had a site licence for ReSharper, so I had to spend some time trying to get RS to work the same way as CodeRush, with keyboard shortcuts, etc.
I guess the options have built up over the years to cater for the differing preferences of developers. In my experience no two devs work in quite the same way.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I use it. The forums are very good as well. I also use a couple of custom plugins - BlockPainter Plus and Documentor that are available in the Visual Studio gallery.
ReSharper is also good but I prefer CodeRush's UI paradigm. However, in both products, there is a hell of a lot to learn! There's a handy CodeRush PDF[^] that is a bit out-of-date but is very useful for having most of what you might want to do in one place.
Kevin
|
|
|
|