|
They also had the option of ringing the doorbell!
|
|
|
|
|
Beware Griff, this evening they will send to jail, for stealing that package.
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Only thing is that it's 08:50 now, so the message is telling me that they could deliver the parcel an hour and a half ago
I see that all the time. Seems like it shouldn't be that hard to substitute the earliest time with the current time if it's in the past, even if only so it doesn't look so dumb.
That, and the weather forecast saying the high's gonna be 24 today, but also reporting it's currently 27. Why not take a chance and report the high as 27 then...?
[Extended rant]
Is there any other job that allows you to be so wrong, so often, and yet remain employed?
I'd love to see someone collect weather forecast data and how it gets revised over time, and then after the fact, compare what was forecast with what you actually got, and plot a graph showing the deviation over time.
"They" keep saying forecasts are now more accurate than ever. I don't believe that for an instant, and I'd more readily believe forecasts were more accurate "back in the day" (whenever that might be).
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,111 5/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨π¨
π¨β¬π¨β¬π¨
π©π©β¬β¬π©
π©π©β¬β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,111 3/6*
β¬β¬β¬β¬π¨
π¨β¬β¬π¨π¨
π©π©π©π©π©
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,111 5/6
β¬β¬β¬β¬π©
β¬β¬π¨β¬π©
π¨β¬π¨π¨π©
β¬π©π©π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
β¬β¬β¬β¬π¨
β¬β¬β¬π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1.111 4/6
π¨β¬β¬β¬β¬
β¬β¬π¨β¬π©
β¬π¨π¨β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,111 5/6
β¬π¨β¬β¬β¬
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
β¬β¬β¬β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Oh man, I was so sure I had it that fourth guess!
And so close to us CPians too 
|
|
|
|
|
That's already been used Sander
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,111 4/6
β¬π¨β¬β¬π¨
β¬π¨π¨π¨π¨
π©π¨β¬π¨π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
I have my own IoT ecosystem, and often when I add to it I feel a little guilty.
Because half the time I am not creating something that's never been done. It's just never been done my way, or on the particular platforms I target, or whatever.
All of my touchpad drivers operate the same way, using the same basic interface. That was worth it to me to create drivers that were like that, so I could easily port my code to all the different IoT devices out there.
My graphics library was the first to support TrueType fonts on IoT and embedded without megs of PSRAM. My graphics library is still the only one to support SVG (yes, the graphical web technology) on the same. That was worth it to me.
I also try to defend it to myself before I make it. I just don't know if my reasons are rationalizations.
Particularly when my dependency graph on a typical project looks like this:
Dependency Graph
|-- htcw_esp_i2c @ 0.1.1
|-- htcw_esp_lcd_panel_ili9342 @ 0.2.0
|-- htcw_uix @ 0.15.4
|-- htcw_esp_wifi_manager @ 0.1.3
|-- htcw_esp_ntp_time @ 0.1.3
|-- htcw_bm8563 @ 0.1.6
|-- htcw_esp_ip_loc @ 0.1.2
|-- htcw_m5core2_power @ 0.1.4
|-- htcw_ft6336 @ 0.1.6
|-- htcw_gfx @ 1.670.2
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Still waiting for the first supply chain malware injection?
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
and am now using uSoft Edge as my browser and I have to admit it's better than a sharp stick in the eye.
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
What was your previous browser, and what led you to the conversion?
"A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants"
Chuckles the clown
|
|
|
|
|
Chrome, then they wouldn't allow AdBlock so I went back to FF, which I had used for years.
Then I start having problems getting links to work, I was getting a lot of "That site can't be reached" errors so I went to Edge to see if it was a browser issue. I was still getting errors!
Turned out to be with the Server 2019 I have as a file server here at the house. For some reason it started having DNS issues and when I set my Windows 11 machine back to using Auto DHCP it cleared every up and it is now working for FF.
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: Chrome, then they wouldn't allow AdBlock
Eh? I run Chrome and have never had a problem with AdBlock - or at least uBlock - except with YT who have been running a blocker war for a year or two now*
Chrome has never refused to run it, and it "just works" with whitelists for sites like CP.
* YT appears to be losing, with updates within hours of them changing it - and the number of people who use ad blockers going up because they had never heard of them before YT started trying to ban them ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
My gripe is with YouTube, they've gotten very aggressive with AdBlockers.
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
They have, and more people are installing them as a result ... 
If they didn't throw so many at each page they would probably get whitelisted more - but I've just opened a page (on the latest GTA V weekly update) and uBlock shows it blocked 77 ads on that single page ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Needless sensory overload, it's no wonder that AdBlock and the like are so popular.
A home without books is a body without soul. Marcus Tullius Cicero
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: If they didn't throw so many at each page
I don't use an ad blocker, other than what the browser might block by default, and I use Pi-Hole separately--which can't do anything about the YT video ad(s) they play before each video. Those are getting increasingly annoying, to the point where I've given up on multiple instances and just closed the browser window because I figured I don't really need to watch a particular video after all, given I'm first presented with a 30s ad I can't skip...
|
|
|
|
|
well it's probably due to the incessant spamming of ads. I am not paying google one f'g nickel.
Charlie Gilley
βThey who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.β BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still using uBlock with Chrome too without any problems.
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC, they're either planning to, or have already, reduce the capabilities of ad-blockers by enforcing "manifest v3".
From what I've read, that means the ad-blocking extension needs to declare all domains it plans to block in advance; it can't use user-specified rules or dynamically-updated lists to decide which domains should be blocked.
It seems like only AdBlock Plus are in favour of the change, and they have a financial relationship with Google.
Firefox and Chrome are squaring off over ad blocker extensions - The Verge[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: needs to declare all domains it plans to block in advance; it can't use user-specified rules or dynamically-updated lists to decide which domains should be blocked.
That's ridiculous - like having to specify which viruses a scanner is allowed to detect at installation.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
