|
I'm almost done - but I'm somewhat stumped on the last step.
Unfortunately, I'm busy tomorrow, but I'll pick up and take care of the rest. Really soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I start my new job as a qualified developer on Monday, can someone turn up and do the work for me?
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes why not? if we have any agreement to direct deposit your pay check to my account
Ranjan.D
|
|
|
|
|
Now your being unreasonable, I will report you for abuse and down vote anything you have done for the last 100 years (as per standard practice)
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Just use this solution[^] - Win/Win for everybody!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
sounds perfect, can you set it up for me
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Bob's typical workday misses an important item ...
- Review of the work done by the outsourced contractor.
Or, rather, just half-hour per day (4:30 to 5:00 pm, which also includes email update to management).
Looks like this was sufficient, given that he was rated high for several quarters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand your problem... I thought you had memorised all of the interview questions and asked the CodeProject guys to answer them for you?
|
|
|
|
|
I did, but now the company unreasonably expects me to be able to actually do the job, The course didn't prepare me for the fact that the stuff I cribbed off CP I might get asked to actually use in the real world.
It's so unfair
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
I ams having doubts about what colours to use for the forms on my products. How do I chose the bestest colours?
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
This is the lo........* typical answer
Was too lazy to write it down completely !
BTW. : Paint all colours on your wall and then chose the best by throwing blindly at it, there where the scissor gets stuck in the wall (or leaves a hole), that's the best
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Just keep the form grey and then paint one of these[^] on your screen
|
|
|
|
|
The "best" color is a setting; make it configurable, so that Marketing can change the color-scheme each week.
Same goes for font, size, and icon-sizes.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
You should have a color palette control at the top of each form, allowing the user to dynamically adjust the color to his liking for ultimate user convenience. But you should disallow him to select the same color for two or more forms in his own best interest in order to make the forms more distinct and the whole application look more cheery!
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't! It reminds me of a product I worked on back in the very early days of Windows. I think every possible font and colour was used.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
We once had a requirement come into a team I working in, for a screen with red lettering on a green background ... the requirement stood despite the advice.
The coder that was given the work was colour blind.
So was the person that QA'd their work.
So was the person that did the acceptance testing.
There were some seriously painful colour combinations doing the rounds until the requirements were amended (to white on black). All in all a huge waste of time and money.
|
|
|
|
|
CHill60 wrote: The coder that was given the work was colour blind.
So was the person that QA'd their work.
So was the person that did the acceptance testing.
That is the most unintentionally hilarious situation I ever heard of
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still chuckling more than 15 years after the event
|
|
|
|
|
(OT, @ closed Q&A)
Sorry for that, I hope your keyboard's allright
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
If I type anything silly I'll blame on a sticky keyboard
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: That is the most unintentionally hilarious situation I ever heard of My first thought - but probably a devilish plan by the client in an attempt to avoid paying!
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
Haha! I can feel your pain
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah but there were only 16 in those days
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
but restricted to bright primary colours
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|