|
V. wrote: #2: Guessing the correct title (without expected cheating) will result in 5+ vote*
It was not correct, so no reason to upvote...
V. wrote: #7: KSS rule applies, however, quotes sometimes have borderline words, those will be masked by a * as much as possible.
How did I break it? By using the word "shagging"? That's a matter of opinion. Personally I teach my sons 2,5 and 5 which words mean what and why and when (not) use them. I would explain "to shag" in the same way as I would explain "to elaborate", "to be bored" or any other vocabulary
Which rules do you believe contradict?
|
|
|
|
|
I believe rule #7 contradicts rule #34.
|
|
|
|
|
deserves a longer reply than I have time to give. Contradict is maybe the wrong word, the post was originally longer and I edited it. The guy sort of got the answer after 40 or so minutes yet this was deemed to early. Some of your rules say upvotes for correct answers but some say not too early.
|
|
|
|
|
I upvote after 1 minute if it is correct and not deemed cheated, the guy was not correct, that's all.
For the upvote you need to be 100% correct. Also note #3 where I state an upvote could be countered, indicating I will always upvote a correct guess.
I'm usually pretty honest and consequent in this stuff.
Besides, it's just a game.
|
|
|
|
|
V. wrote: Besides, it's just a game.
Exactly,
Don't see how somebody posting the correct solution early stops other people posting jokey comments.
|
|
|
|
|
"Gone with the Wind - The 70s"
(yes|no|maybe)*
"Fortunately, we don't need details - because we can't solve it for you." - OriginalGriff
|
|
|
|
|
I slip her a length or two ?[^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Ah yes I know, it was Grandma from Nutty Professor II: The Klumps[^]!
Geek code v 3.12 {
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty certain it's within my Powers to identify the movy, even to possibly pin down the particular actress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharknado 5 - sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads in a tornado
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
If there are any Eminem fans around on CodeProject. But this new Phenomenal Music film[^] is a great track by Eminem. If you are an action, animation or music fan, you should try it out.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't call myself a fan, but I find a few good songs on every album.
I am an action, animation and music fan and will check it out when I get off work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like some of his music. Will check this out later, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently we're to expect[^] a new Maunder minimum[^].
Admit it, you're just trolling your favourite troll.
On a more serious note, this breakthrough in science means that we can predict the climate with a lot better accuracy.
<edit>fixed wikilink</edit>
modified 13-Jul-15 2:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
*gasp*
but everyone knows that humans control the climate with c02- that's heresy Jorgie
Bryce
MCAD
---
|
|
|
|
|
I realize I probably shouldn't have posted that in the Lounge.
So if you want a serious discussion we probably should move over to the soapbox. (where I won't answer for a day or so, since I'll be travelling)
Otherwise let me just state my opinion, that in the big picture we still don't know sh*t.
|
|
|
|
|
but a gazillion scientists cant be wrong!
MCAD
---
|
|
|
|
|
Because they never been before?
BTW I'm not a GW denier, I just believe there's a lot more to it than that.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: BTW I'm not a GW denier
Methinks he doth protest too much...
Denier! Denier! The Consensus cannot be wrong! Outcast! Unclean!
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: in the big picture we still don't know sh*t
But on the positive side, we have a slightly better way of not knowing it now
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Bye,Bye, Global Warming"!
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
I reckon Michael Martin can give you an appropriate definition of a Maunder Minimum...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|