|
Wordle 615 4/6
π©β¬β¬β¬β¬
π©π©β¬π©β¬
π©π©β¬π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
All green, but never heard of this word.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 5/6
π©β¬β¬β¬π¨
π©β¬β¬π©β¬
π©β¬β¬π©β¬
π©π©β¬π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 3/6*
π©π©π¨β¬β¬
π©π©β¬π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Not if you have a good starter!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 6/6
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
β¬π¨π¨π¨β¬
π¨π¨β¬β¬π¨
π¨β¬π¨π¨β¬
π©π©β¬π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
β¬π©π¨β¬β¬
β¬π©β¬π¨β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming βWow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 3/6
β¬π¨β¬β¬β¬
π¨π¨β¬π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Popped into my head
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 4/6*
β¬π©β¬β¬β¬
β¬π©β¬β¬β¬
π¨π©β¬π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 5/6
β¬π¨π¨β¬β¬
β¬π¨β¬β¬β¬
π©π©π¨β¬β¬
π©π©π¨π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
I didn't know this word, it looked like a typo, I managed to get it by brute forcing the last letter.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 6/6
π¨β¬β¬β¬β¬
β¬β¬β¬β¬π¨
β¬π¨π¨β¬β¬
π¨β¬β¬π¨π¨
π©π©β¬π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
I recently played a game that used this word, hadn't heard of it before that.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 3/6
🟩β¬β¬β¬🟨
🟩🟨🟨β¬β¬
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
solved in 3
|
|
|
|
|
StarNamer@work wrote: Are they getting harder? I always feel like Friday is trickier than normal.
Wordle 615 4/6*
β¬β¬β¬π¨β¬
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
π¨π¨π¨π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 615 5/6
π©β¬π¨β¬β¬
π©β¬β¬β¬π¨
π©β¬π¨π©β¬
π©π¨β¬π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #398 2/6 (100%)
π©π©π©π¨β¬βοΈ
π©π©π©π©π©π
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
Knew is was west africa
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
I got some Fortran code with the extension .f.
how difficult to run through them in GFortran now? I have touched Fortran since I left school.
also I searched around and try to find a good IDE for GFortran. any recommendations for such IDEs?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southmountain wrote: also I searched around and try to find a good IDE for GFortran. any recommendations for such IDEs? Ehr.. Fortran??
We keep burying VB6. Fortran?? Do we need to shoot it again?
Is the Fortran code worth anything? If yes, then maybe rewrite it in a modern language? You made me curious and awaiting your answer.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
yes, it implements some algorithms on astrophysics I guess...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
If you plan to do programming in the area of astrophysics ...
There was an excellent program called Astronomy Lab for Windows, ALW - or ALW203 for the last version; I believe it was published in 1996. Maybe I should say that there is (not 'was') this program: It will still run under Windows 10. The functionality is great.
The only problem is that the user interface suggests that it was developed under Windows 1.0. You can't zoom fonts, all text is monospaced 'fixedsys' (the 'Set font' command has no effect), tables are drawn using |, + and - characters, graphs are drawn using hairlines, there is no support for cut & paste, scroll wheel and several other standard Windows functions. 30 years ago I was in contact with the developer, offering to update the user interface (I had a visually handicapped daughter who couldn't see the hairlines and needed a bigger font), but I was turned down: He had no intentions to continue developing the program, so there was no reason for him to let anyone improve the UI(!)
I have never found any replacement for ALW providing the same functionality and simplicity of use (in spite of its UI shortcomings). So if you go ahead developing anything with similar functionality, and a more modern UI, please use ALW as a checklist for what to include, and present the results as a CP article!
ALW203 is still available for downloading from a large number of sites on internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: We keep burying VB6. Fortran?? Do we need to shoot it again? Don't worry - it was shot, the Fortran giving you nightmares.
C.A.R. Hoare was right in his remark to the proposed extensions for Fortran 77: "I don't know what programming languages will look like in year 2000, but they will be named Fortran!"
I suspect that if you were presented with sample of modern Fortran code, you would never guess that the language is named Fortran. The evolution from Fortran IV to modern Fortran is more drastic than the evolution of the original thick coax 3 Mbps linear bus Ethernet to the Ethernet of today, using Cat6/RJ45, 1 Gbps, star topology.
A couple of years ago, a friend of mine working at the Supercomputing center of the Norwegian Universities. He told me that Fortran (in the modern form) still is a very significant language in supercomputer environments. Lots of scientists / developers find Fortran much more suitable than C/C++ for array manipulation, and lots of engineering problems are essentially array manipulation.
|
|
|
|
|
Fortran must be one of the most maligned programming languages ever -- and that's saying something. FORTRAN-IV was pretty awful, admittedly, but versions starting with Fortran-77 onwards were both very useful and usable -- regardless of the opinions of academic computer scientists. And modern Fortran is very much alive and well. Although I've spent most of the last 35 years using C, C++ and Python, I have no complaints about the Fortran versions I used (a lot) way back when and still use for hobbyist purposes. C++, on the other hand ... ... (although C++11 onwards is pretty decent).
|
|
|
|
|
trΓΈnderen wrote: Don't worry - it was shot, the Fortran giving you nightmares. It was a one night stand.
trΓΈnderen wrote: C.A.R. Hoare was right in his remark to the proposed extensions for Fortran 77: "I don't know what programming languages will look like in year 2000, but they will be named Fortran!" I'm awaiting Fortran.NET.
Most people do not own a supercomputer. The thing that Fortran has going for it, is that it isn't VB6
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
You sort of remind me of Peter.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Is the Fortran code worth anything? If yes, then maybe rewrite it in a modern language? "If if works, don't fix it!"
Rewriting software to a potentially poorly suited other language, just because that other language is fashionable in many software development communities, may be a bad idea. Not always, but you need some stronger arguments than "We don't think Fortran IV reflects modern ideas about programming languages."
|
|
|
|
|
|