|
#Worldle #484 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
easy
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
greetings kind regards would this work ? lets say a million people wear full-body suits/apparatus/cameras/microphones etc. of some sorts and thus collect all sensory and motor input/output to perform their daily tasks . this occurs for a year lets say . all the human motor functions are translated to the motor controls necessary to control a humanoid robot to perform identical physical maneuvers . all this information i.e. motor controls, visual, haptic, acoustic etc. etc. etc. are utilized to train AI software which will control our friend the robot . will the robot now be able to do our house cleaning cook our meals do our laundry etc. etc. etc. ? sounds reasonable to me . wadya think .
|
|
|
|
|
BernardIE5317 wrote: all the human motor functions are translated to the motor controls necessary to control a humanoid robot to perform identical physical maneuvers .
There's the rub. How do you abstract the data into a convenient model?
BernardIE5317 wrote: all this information i.e. motor controls, visual, haptic, acoustic etc. etc. etc. are utilized to train AI software which will control our friend the robot .
You are conflating a large number of problems, none of which are completely solved: machine hearing, vision, touch, taste/smell. Simulating a human requires a lot more than just handwaving.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but you still need to build a model whose parameters can be optimized by the "deep learning" process. Building a good model is the difficult part; optimization of the parameters is "merely" an enormous regression problem.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
And we will all be in the gyms fighting obesity. 😂
|
|
|
|
|
People wouldn't even wear masks, so no, it won't work.
|
|
|
|
|
perhaps they would if of course they would share in the profits upon completion of project and sales of 1B of the units
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalism won't let that happen.
|
|
|
|
|
As it turns out “people” were right not to wear masks. Nearly all studies find it was a waste. Recent studies (Germany) even show that wearing a mask was “bad” (particularly for pregnant women) as it jacked up CO2 levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click bait source.
It was published on a pay to publish "science" site named heliyon.
So of course everyone wants to use it to justify their claims. Or at least to raise their site traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh. That explains it. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fgs1963 wrote: Feel free to ignore science if it doesn’t fit your narrative
Same to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: However, the editor-in-chief of the Cochrane Library, Dr. Karla Soares-Weiser, issued a statement on March 10 to say the analysis had been misinterpreted and that the review didn't find that masks do not work.
Rather it looked at how effective masking programs, like mandates, were at slowing the spread of respiratory viruses and, from there, found the results to be inconclusive. In other words, people don't listen to mandates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The robot would weigh ten tons and probably have 10 arms. (We always think we could use an extra hand)
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
|
All it did was shuffle around ... my Roomba does that.
The robot dog already weighs as much as a man. It runs and can shoot a machine gun. Tie a shoe lace? Nope.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
If you're thinking of having it "clean the house" as just playing back a recorded macro, your robot's training will only be useful for your own house.
Besides, trip him, and all bets are off.
|
|
|
|
|
Dang it Sally that idiot robot just threw Fluffy into the trash again!
|
|
|
|
|
it is my understanding the whole point of so called "deep learning" is to learn from a vast collection of knowledge which somehow mysteriously enables a neural network to generalize what it has been trained on . no-one knows what goes on inside a neural network . it is a kind of magic . it is my own opinion "centers" are formed for each identifiable feature and patterns of connection betwixt and between . so upon a new input the collection of centers w/ the strongest connections are activated . this is why Bing Image Creator can draw things it has never seen exactly except previously in vast amounts in various guises . if i ask it to draw unicorn assembling a pizza it will do so even though i assume it has never seen such prior .
|
|
|
|
|
BernardIE5317 wrote: etc. etc. etc. ?
It's the etc etc etc I'm interested in, but those full-body suits...
you know, cleaning the litterbox, mowing the lawn, doing the shopping for me...
|
|
|
|