|
harold aptroot wrote: Confiscate their coding licenses
You are much too lenient. That sort of blunder calls for staking out on an anthill, at the very least!
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: RSPCA
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Ants?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it is because you don't know how to program in C#?
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm. maybe though. But I guess I have some level of proficiency in C# and have being doing some real complex stuffs... But for once I came across need for Data-flow (Producer consumer pattern with BlockingCollection) I found an example of BlockingQueue in java very handy and translate to c#.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at the TPL Dataflow library. It's stupid easy and does the job nicely without needing any of that mungy blocking.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
Dgmarious wrote: But... I am not that Java guy. That's good. Most of the Java guys I met were fanatics, as if the language had been invented as part of a clever plan by Scientology.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
CodeWraith wrote: Most of the Java guys I met were fanatics
I encountered that 25 years ago. Gads, is it still true today, or did they all become Ruby fanatics?
|
|
|
|
|
At least those that tried to assimilate me about four years ago still were.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
Essentially, if you know Java, then you're basically familiar with C#. Even a lot of the class names are the same.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
As your other post eluded to, yeah, Java loves its patterns, and sometimes there's a gem in some Java example. On the other hand, the reason Java loves its patterns so much is that doing complex things in Java is so much more of a PITA.
|
|
|
|
|
Joint in the Spanish area of London (5)
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
Joint in
the Spanish EL
area of London BOW
ELBOW
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
A Mercury Prize winging itself your way ...
|
|
|
|
|
This is awesome![^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliant.
|
|
|
|
|
A horse, a horse. My Kingdom for a horse!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
After two weeks of playing with a 3D printer, I finally have some useful results. This is a landing gear I have made for a 1/16 scale Seaking. The landing gear is going to be retractable and the model is going to fly, of course.
Constructing and printing a landing gear[^]
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
Do the cut out circles in the flange add strength? Or are they cut out to reduce weight?
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
They reduce weight without sacrificing too much strength. You will find this all over an aircraft.[^] If you choose the right materials and profiles. you can have 70 - 90 percent of the strength at 30 - 50 percent of the weight. For the model they are too small to be really significant and it comes down to just mimicing the looks of the original.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
Not to mention that the plastic of the model is massively thicker than the sheet ally of the real thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: massively thicker
When compared to scale, of course. That's also the reason why the bathtub sized Titanic does not sink when it collides with your Ducky. If the hull plates were made exactly to scale, they would be no more than tinfoil.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|
|
If your Titanic was 1/16 scale do you really think it would fit in your bath?
I was wondering whether you could have made it out of thin alloy instead, much more realistic.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. 1/200 or even smaller, if you want to get in as well. For a helicopter 1/16 is about as small as I would like to go. The additional mass makes it more stable and very much less nervous in the air and you have a better ratio of the motor power to the heli's mass, compared to smaller models.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
|
|
|
|