|
Definitely
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: CodeProject provides a mechanism whereby authors can specify page breaks which allows readers to view it in one piece or page-by-page.
That would be cool. Plus an "e-book" section.
|
|
|
|
|
#2
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Consider releasing it as a book
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Consider releasing it as a book
I've contacted SyncFusion.
|
|
|
|
|
I only look at the photos...
(reverse playboy reference here).
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: I only look at the photos...
That's how I used to read Scientific American. The articles in Hefner's mag were much better.
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't matter as long as it's short.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Doesn't matter as long as it's short.
Sorry, can't be done.
|
|
|
|
|
If there are logical parts, break them apart, otherwise I prefer them in one piece.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd prefer one long article, but if it is 120 pages, surely there are different aspects that can be split off into different articles. If split up, each article should be a standalone issue that is complete. I don't want to read (or print (?!)) multiple things for one thought process.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Is it long because of actual comment or is it repetitive? The latter being the biggest sin of anyone thinking like a PhD or a "published" writer (paid by the word and all that.)
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: Is it long because of actual comment or is it repetitive?
Content. Besides covering the spec and its complexities, contradictions, and ambiguities, it covers implementation, unit tests, and a demo, which in itself requires a lightweight server implementation.
But critique for yourself.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I skimmed the article (the subject matter doesn't interest me); I say it definitely should be split into a series of at least two, if not three, articles.
|
|
|
|
|
... the text (probably translated) of the spam posts are horrendous and sometimes funny, makes you wonder if we should let the through the moderation process to make the day brighter
|
|
|
|
|
They do seem to have been translated from Marketese to English via Swahili and Norwegian, don't they?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
... gained in translation ...
|
|
|
|
|
No, in all languages; no.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I run an email server at home, and there is this one spambot that tries to send us this ridiculous spam, about 4 times a minute, 24 hours a day, for 3 years now. It is 100% rejected, every single one, easily. But they never slow down. At some point you would think they would realize that if the first million got rejected, they are kind of wasting there time on us.
Dense mother f'rs.
|
|
|
|
|
They're waiting for a sysop to accidentally clear the spam filter, or if it's a paid filter for it to expire.
Have you tried closing the port during the wee hours/public holiday? It may get dropped from the list if it doesn't see reaction on the mail ports (just announce it as sched maint for the important genuine users.)
Format Success.
Welcome to your new signa&*(gD@@@ @@@@@@*@x@@
|
|
|
|
|
No I don't close the port, friends and family across the country depend on it. And it's a cluster so it stays up even during maintenance.
However, I DO run fail2ban on my edge firewall (Bob be praised!)
And fail2ban rejects their coming traffic even before it hits the MTA.
Their packets just drop - like dookie on the street. It's so satisfying to see millions upon millions of dropped connections in the firewall logs.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be starting at my new job on Monday.
And at my first assignment on Tuesday.
A good hour commute, have to start at 7, leave at 6 and get up at 5, if I don't want to get stuck in traffic every day
I currently start at 10 and live 20 minutes by bike from work, I'll miss that
Other than that I'm expecting good times
|
|
|
|
|
07:00 start? I assume you get away early as well?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, after 8 hours I guess.
Probably half an hour lunch, so that's 15:30.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck, Sander.
Up at 5, though? Doesn't the Geneva Convention protect us from that sort of thing?
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|