|
COBOL at least had a cross-reference listing.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: COBOL at least
COBOL! COBOL! I'm triggered!
|
|
|
|
|
It was just your imagination running away with you.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
+1 for the musical reply.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: +1 for the musical reply. and such a good one too. Love that song. What a great start to my morning.
|
|
|
|
|
As Murphy said...
if it works at the first try... you did it wrong.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: As Murphy said...
if it works at the first try... you did it wrong.
Now that makes sense to me! This will be my guiding principle from here on.
|
|
|
|
|
Surprise-driven development.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: Surprise-driven development.
SDD - The oldest and best Software Methodology!
|
|
|
|
|
It's kinda like golf. Frustration, frustration, frustration...then you smoke a 3-wood and really enjoy it again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it works the very first time you tried it, then you
definitely got something wrong that will come back and bite you on the ass in a few months.
|
|
|
|
|
Don Hughes wrote: definitely got something wrong
Many people are posting this.
|
|
|
|
|
If it works the first time through, there is definitely something wrong...
Steve Naidamast
Sr. Software Engineer
Black Falcon Software, Inc.
blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed today that my Outlook now has a new searchbar. Evidently it's way better so I tried it.
Still the same endless progress dots.
Still the same blank results page even though I'm asking it to list emails from a single person whom I get about a billion emails a week from
No option to restrict the search to "this folder" instead of "this mailbox" (which massively improves performance)
So...a step backwards.
I use GMail and as I type it automatically suggestions refinements based on the results it's found in between key strokes. It's truly bizarre how bad outlook search is.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: results it's found in between key strokes.
I dislike that quite a bit.
Don't search until I tell you to search, dagnabit!
Also searches which only OR and never AND -- drives me nuts, totally useless.
|
|
|
|
|
You dislike having results appear as you type?
That is curious.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Of course.
"You need to cut the blue wire... but before you do that..."
|
|
|
|
|
curmudgeon!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads-up. I noticed it a couple of days ago and wondered if it was too good to be true.
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried it, and it picked up 54 emails from you in my deleted items folder1 out of the 8,575 items in there2 pretty much immediately. Only niggle is that it won't show me which folder an item is in.
Are you IMAP or POP3? This was on my desktop, so it uses POP3 and downloads all emails to here to clear the server. The other devices use IMAP and leave it on the server for this machine to pull down. I really hate 500MB inboxes on the server!
1: Everything goes in there when it no longer needs comments, and isn't directly money related - not a slight at you or CP, I just like to keep the inbox for new and current items only.
2: About 3 months worth - I archive emails fairly regularly.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You're off my Christmas list.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If it's any consolation, I have one user on my domain whose mailbox limit is currently 5GB, and I'll have to extend it soon as she's up to 83% full ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't be easier to ask her to delete some things?
Be careful, outlook used to have problems managing big pst files (4 Gb or so)
I don't know the new versions though
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest thing is to do nothing. Then the problem will soon take care of itself.
|
|
|
|