|
Low but hardly new. 15 years ago I ran into multiple sites counting down until the Olson Twins were legal.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
And yet there never was a site counting down until they were attractive.
|
|
|
|
|
Be kinda hard to do since that point is never getting any closer in time...
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
chriselst wrote: that promotes paedophilia and is full of photos and no content.
The first is nonsense.
The age of consent in the UK is 17. It is more complicated for ages slightly less than that but the UK, like many more intelligent places, recognizes that teenagers have sex. And two horny 15 year olds having sex are not pedophiles.
And anyone that thinks that sex with a 17 year old is the same as sex with a 7 year old is an idiot.
Not to mention of course that the specific person you reference later on is specifically someone that an actual pedophile would NOT want to have sex with because those individuals specifically do not want to have sex with individuals who look like they are sexually mature (regardless of their age.)
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: The age of consent in the UK is 17.
16, but good start to your rebuttal.
jschell wrote: And anyone that thinks that sex with a 17 year old is the same as sex with a 7 year old is an idiot.
Very true.
jschell wrote: Not to mention of course that the specific person you reference later
I didn't mention anyone later on, although the link did, and one of those was 8 at the time. So, you equate sex with a 17 year old with sex with an 8 year old then. I'm glad we were able to find out your cutoff point.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I have to get gay porn up on another tab so I can quickly switch to that if someone were to come in.
|
|
|
|
|
Please do, and help fill the lakes (wink wink).
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, if you don't mind.
We don't have enough to share.
(Although it is raining as I write, but the proverbial drop in the bucket.)
What, me worry?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I am too much of an anarchist to appreciate patronism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And Very Impressive It Is Too[^]
I was up there yesterday having a look around.
Thankfully we didn't see Wand Erection.
This is a beast of a ship though.
The Gondola is the size of a Ford Transit.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Dave, haven't you heard, they don't really count if they're full of hot air (or silicon)!
|
|
|
|
|
It makes you wonder where they keep something like that. Do they have to make special hangers or something?
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Waffle wrote: special hangers Yes, the hang it on one mother of a hanger, in an extremely over-sized closet!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
No, but it is kept in the biggest hangAr in the world
See Here[^]
My company bought them a few years ago.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: My company bought them a few years ago.
Why haven't you mentioned this before?
|
|
|
|
|
Oversight.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Where have you been? - He goes on and on about these two great big hemispherical constructions that he gets to play with everyday!
|
|
|
|
|
You missed the sarcasm then.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom is from NZ.
Sarcasm hasn't reach them yet.
They are still toying with metaphor and irony.
(Note : USA is considering learning what Irony is)
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|