|
Cut committee for writing aid (9)
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, very good!
I did yesterday, so I'll let someone else get it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Clipboard?
"This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedivere. Explain to me again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes"
|
|
|
|
|
We have a winner.
Well done. Hopefully self-explanatory but cut = CLIP, committee = BOARD and a clipboard is a writing aid.
Interesting discovery of the day: My intended clue was for "snookered" but apparently the word has a completely different meaning in U.S. English where it means conned rather than stymied.
|
|
|
|
|
Best one for a while
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure Google was serving up adult content within minutes of the site first opening...if not before....
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
They celebrated with balloons because she lost her flower.
|
|
|
|
|
perhaps that made it big
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
It was a growth market, you think?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Investigations show they get pfizer and pfizer each day.
(In Matrix terms...they took the blue pill, not the red)
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we should erect a monument to Google?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
if it stands and fits and not gets messy. Why not!
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
a monument with balloons?
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Some kind of rubber covering would probably be a good idea...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
As long as it is weatherproof
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Why using Typescript, if there's already ECMA6 [^] available in almost all browsers?
|
|
|
|
|
Mysteries over mysteries.
Why would anybody use an interpreter after getting rid of a C64?
Why would someone use something that is compiled to interpreted code?
Why would people merrily reinvent the wheel over and over again?
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Because TypeScript provides much more than what ES6 provides. Also takes care of compilation and fallback to ES5 or lesser.
Quick start · TypeScript[^]
TypeScript is Superset of JavaScript (ES6 too). This simply means that you have everything available in TypeScript which you have in ES6 + more.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
Because TYPEscript is typed?
And compiles to JavaScript that is available in ALL browsers (and not ALMOST all...)?
Or because a project already used it from a time before ECMA6?
Maybe the customer for that project uses IE that doesn't support anything?
Or because JavaScript is a pile of garbage (even ECMA6) and TypeScript fixes some of that?
Just some guesses, I've never actually worked with TypeScript
|
|
|
|
|
Well, a "pile of garbage" for the most used language is a bit inappropriate.
I mean, a few can be wrong, but so many? i really don't think so ..
|
|
|
|
|
A whole lot of people listen to Justin Bieber and think he is wonderful. Are they correct as well?
Popular != good
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh come on ... what the hell has Bieber to do with JavaScript now? .. come on, let's be constructive
|
|
|
|
|
Both are garbage that is popular with a certain sector of the potential market.
Just because something is popular with a subgroup, doesn't mean it is a good product.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Actually Griffs analogy is bloody good.
There's a whole raft of people who think a McDonalds is good food when it most clearly isn't. Just because something has a large user base, qv Smoking, it does not follow that it is any good. Popularity is not the same as Quality. JavaScript is to quality code what McD's is to fine dining.
Argument. Closed.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|