|
|
The strange thing is now that you can find more stuff from the 'official press' reporting on conspiracies than there are publications by the conspirators.
At least it feels like this
|
|
|
|
|
Reasonable and non-vaccinated doesn't exist as a combination.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yes it does exist. For my wife the vaccination is a high health risk, confirmed by doctors. But I feel very comfortable with her because she strictly adheres to the usual security measures (distance, mask, desinfection). Much better than 99% of those vaccinated!
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: For my wife the vaccination is a high health risk It's not. Go talk to a doctor.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes of course you know that all....better...
|
|
|
|
|
Not just me.
Anyone who had basic education.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ehr.. let me check..
"No".
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Just think you omniscient unicellular organism: If you were allergic to Morphine, where would you be now? Try to get your one cell to think!
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: If you were allergic to Morphine, where would you be now? I'd be ded. Very; been a month since I kicked the habit.
So, your wife is allergic to RNA?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Now, one can not say she is allergic to RNA (not proved, how? she would have to risk that). But she does react very allergic to a lot of meds very strange.
a.) Vaccinations like against ticks -> Very serious recations
b.) Antibiotics needed because of an (simple knee) operation -> Very serious recations
Why she should risk anything which is rarely tested?
[Edit]
And sorry for my aggression above
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Antibiotics needed because of an (simple knee) operation -> Very serious recations I can only light a candle for her. Did.
0x01AA wrote: And sorry for my aggression above You have the right to.
My respect to you.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: So, your wife is allergic to RNA?
Absolutely not, she'd be dead already if she was.
But the RNA is encapsulated in lipids so it can survive until it can reach a cell (RNA is highly unstable), some people might be allergic to those lipids.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Much better than 99% of those vaccinated! Hm ... where did you get that figure?
The vast majority of people I know to be vaccinated are behaving sensibly and still following other precautions. It could be better I agree, and of course, my observations might be influenced by the fact I tend to hang around with sensible people and avoid idiots like the ... oh ... was going to say "plague" but I guess that's outdated now . I'll "avoid idiots like Covid" from now on I think
|
|
|
|
|
Reasonable and unvaccinated is an oxymoron.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's just entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
You have no clue to how many systems are still running on mainframes.
|
|
|
|
|
I was referring to the COBOL part
|
|
|
|
|
There are computerized systems that need to permit tens of thousands — if not hundreds of thousands — of users to access it simultaneously.
Examples would be banks, airlines (for reservation systems), stock brokerages, etc.
In all of these instances, the amount of I/O bandwidth required is enormous.
Mainframes happen to be designed with this in mind since the 1960s.
The IBM/360 series (now, the Z series) had a maximum of 16 channels in its largest configurations on its biggest processors.
There were byte multiplexor channels for handling slow character-at-a-time input devices (terminals) and selector channels which talked to tape drives, disk drives, printers and such high-speed devices. The maximum speed on a selector channel used to be 16 MB/sec.
A few years ago when I checked, you could have 64 channels s(c/t)reaming at 256 MB/sec. I am sure both the number of channels and the throughput per channel have gone up since then.
Most commercial data processing requires high I/O bandwidth because the applications are I/O bound, not compute bound.
There is no point in increasing the MIPS ( million instructions per second) rate if you can’t get data in and out fast.
You can try and find out the maximum I/O throughput on your favorite PC or Unix box and see how it is dwarfed by mainframes.
I blame your lack of knowledge about these matters on the educational system.
Learning about the design of Intel processors, ARM chips, RISC chips, etc., is not learning about computer architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tl;dr
|
|
|
|
|