|
But your new theory of gravitation is going downhill.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
you should check in with your super, conducting yourself like that will have everyone breaking the rules.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
You won't get me to fall for that old one!
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I think we should just let that thought spin for a while.
|
|
|
|
|
How long should we weight?
|
|
|
|
|
I feel forced into an equal and opposite opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on how much friction your theory encounters.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Give it a rest and move on.
Wait - what????
Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)
|
|
|
|
|
down votes solutions just for the health of it?
Shortly after posting a solution, almost faster than they could possibly cut and paste the solution to verify it works, the solution is down voted. They don't provide any useful feedback or comment, just the down vote.
What are they getting out of this?
Can a CP admin find out if it is the same person doing this?
|
|
|
|
|
littleGreenDude wrote: down votes solutions just for the health of it? I find it to be healthier to ignore the votes.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
True that. It is just a minor annoyance. Without additional feedback from the down voter, it adds no value to the question or solution and is really a disservice to the CP community.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, there is. I posted about not too long ago. Every solution in a few Q&A posts was down voted. One reason why down-votes on regular posts don't effect points is that drive-by down-voting became quite an epidemic.
It takes all kinds of people to make a world - but we don't need all of them.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
well it's more of a bugs and sugs discussion but
- there's always been the debate that down votes should require a comment (min 50 chars...)
- and then on that an option to appeal a dv based on the comment (wrong, nasty, off topic, meaningless...)
but then the admins / moderators realised that would mean more work for them (following up on dv protests) so it gets tossed into the "too hard" basket. To cover themselves usually they will respond with "the down voter will eventually get a bad rep and loose rights, or they will just get bored and go away." of course in real life those things seemingly don't seem to happen, but whose to say it's not just new idiots replacing the old ones, there's a whole world of assholes out there.
I'm actually OK with the status quo, I'm OK that the admins/mods don't want more work, (after all they are volunteers), just wish they would be upfront about the real reason they down vote the down-vote-must-comment.
Anyway, as others have said:
don't worry about the down votes (world full of wankers), if it's good enough it'll get kudos [often from the OP - but some of them are jerks too and say nothing],
... you still get that personal satisfaction you [may have] helped someone, and perhaps the next guy too searching on the same question
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: min 50 chars ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
It doesn't really help requiring a comment.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I could tell it was only a couple of downvotes, but it was indeed from the same person. Normally I'd like to see more of a trend before taking action, but this person hasn't been around for long and hasn't posted a single thing, so out they go.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the fast response and quick action!
|
|
|
|
|
Change your moniker to Sean the Assassin.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
... really means what it says. I've spent parts of the last three days diagnosing a problem where my app was complaining of an incorrect version reported by one of the services I use to talk to the hardware. This is happening on a 'new' test machine in a lab.
I checked the version of the service installed on the test machine. Correct.
I checked the version of the service included in the installation. Correct.
I checked the code in the build. Correct.
The app and service install correctly on my desk and on a freshly-imaged machine.
[!@#$!$#@!] expletives redacted
This morning I go back to the lab, and as I'm walking down there... What if there's more than one copy of the service .EXE on the machine?
In fact, there are two:
C:\Program Files\...\PgSwService.exe and
C:\Program Files (x86)\...\PgSwService.exe ing dammit. This supposedly 'new' machine was actually a very old one, with a version of the service from 2013.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't some of that stuff there for backward compatibility so the (x86) stuff was there even on a new machine?
|
|
|
|
|
There are conventions for which directory you use for an install. 32-bit apps usually go in the "...(x86)" folder. IIRC, the intent was that you could have both 32 and 64-bit versions of applications installed in parallel, and not have them conflict with each other.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
RickZeeland wrote: the free to play
but does it cost $$ to actually do well and win?
My experience is that these free to play models, actually require you to make in game purchases to really enjoy/play well/win anything.
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't played it long enough to say anything sensible about that, but as you can see in the comments on the Steam website some people complain about it. But hey, it's free and if you don't like it, it's not the end of the world
|
|
|
|
|
Did you ever meet any real generals or heroes. After that you will have no more questions.
Generals are cool. They can't be promoted much further. One of them was really happy because I asked him to show me his Id. It was his first visit and I did not know him, so I had to check before rolling out the carpet.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
CodeWraith wrote: One of them was really happy because I asked him to show me his Id.
But did he show you his Ego and Super-Ego[^] also? *
*It had to be done.
|
|
|
|