|
CodeMarkup for WinUI enables you to build user interfaces declaratively in C# code using fluent methods Why do all that design stuff, when you can just write more code?
edit: forgot the blurb
modified 10-Jul-24 14:07pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks cool!
And the fluent interface as potential.
But let me ask quick question from the top of my head without thinking much about it myself, about what is usually incompatible with C# syntax, i.e. markup extensions such as DataBinding and, err.. other Markup Extensions, like, mmm yes, StaticResource?!
|
|
|
|
|
Now, wrap a WYSIWYG UI around it, sell it to MSFT, and go brave a new frontier.
Oh, and if we can make it able to target wasm, that'd be great.
I'm not sure it ever really popped into mind that we ditched WYSIWYG explicitly because we wanted FE to be more esoteric to veneer/mirage it out of being opaquely like stacking children's blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer WinForms still. It is such a fast way to deploy new apps. Rather than worrying about how something looks, I just used the standard interface and get to writing the code which was the whole point of opening Visual Studio.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
Ubiquitous RADIUS scheme uses homegrown authentication based on MD5. Yup, you heard right. A straight line to the center of security
I suppose it's a good sign this hasn't been used until now? (I hope)
|
|
|
|
|
RADIUS is a terrible, terrible protocol with even more terrible implementations. I sincerely hope this will kill it dead.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
We’re thrilled to announce the release of OpenSilver 3.0, the free and open-source UI framework for building modern .NET web applications in C# and XAML! When in doubt, bolt an "AI" to it and call it a release
It works for Microsoft, after all...
|
|
|
|
|
Check Point Research (CPR) has identified a critical zero-day spoofing attack exploiting Microsoft Internet Explorer on modern Windows 10/11 systems, despite the browser's retirement. Internet Explorer: the gift that keeps on giving
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like Eric Lawrence's advice on Xitter two weeks ago[^] was prescient:
REG ADD "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Hta" /v "DisableHTMLApplication" /t REG_DWORD /d 1 /f
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Technical decision-makers facing the challenge of migrating legacy systems from old .NET Framework 4.x WinForm apps face a common thread: whether to continue with traditional WinForms or something modern and promising, like .NET MAUI. One potato, two potato, three potato, four. Don't take my WinForms, or there will be war.
|
|
|
|
|
History repeats itself. Any new GUI framework has been abandoned, is not complete or is a fustercluck with no viable documentation.
WinForms always had our back, we all learnt how to work with its "features" and it requires very little surrounding architecture. It's time we have its back as well!
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Error-correcting a quantum computer can mean processing 100TB every second. You need someone to actually do the work
|
|
|
|
|
100TB per second?
That's A LOT of cat videos... or not.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Advances in artificial intelligence are making it increasingly difficult to distinguish between uniquely human behaviors and those that can be replicated by machines. I can barely tell when I'm conscious
|
|
|
|
|
When the number of scam calls I receive drops precipitously, I'll assume consciousness has been achieved. 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
consciousness != (Ethic or Moral)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Decline in human intelligence
FTFY.
If a large table can achieve sentience I'm going to Mount Tai to awaken my Qi.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
The answer to this question is "Yes, AIs will eventually become conscious." However, the current crop of "Artificial Intelligence" will never achieve consciousness and in fact show the sheer limits of our ability to create a true SADE (Self Aware Digital Entity)*
*Scott Jucha "The Silver Ships"
|
|
|
|
|
"AGI will get here very soon."
No it won't, but I'm too conscious to argue it with an IIT proponent.
The only reason to subscribe to such simplicity is so you can say "hey, it's conscious!"
|
|
|
|
|
A real AI... could be, I don't know.
What we now have it is not AI, so... nothing else than a clickbait and a bullsh1t bingo article.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The preview doesn't include much new major functionality or features, as Microsoft is nearing the final stages of .NET 9 development, which is scheduled for general availability in November. Get your latest preview while it's still fresh from the oven
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is reportedly having trouble getting some of the biggest names in tech to optimize their apps and add new features for 'AI PCs.' "I'm going off the rails on a crazy train"
Many times burned, many times+1 shy
|
|
|
|
|
That is very good news. I hope they have LOTs of trouble with that and I have zero interest in an "AI PC", regardless of who makes it.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted to reply something clever but now I have Ozzy Osbourne's voice and Randy Rhoades guitars using 100% of the available brainpower.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
According to Luca Casonato on Twitter, every Chromium-based browser leaks information about your computer to domains owned by Google. Google spying on people? Inconceivable!
Maybe it's honest and not a built-in monitor, but it's not like they deserve the benefit of a doubt.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
