|
When did you stop caring about Memory Management, and is that a bad thing? When we stopped caring
|
|
|
|
|
As soon as we thought we could get away with it ?
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Java is the programming language with the highest average salary, according to Emolument report "Must be funny, in a rich man's world" (in the UK, anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
They also have the highest rate of tolerance toward their subject...and they need it...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Google Cardboard saves baby's life - CNN.com[^]
Simply awesome.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
In an interesting presentation [video link] at the 32nd Chaos Communication Congress (32C3) held at the end of December, Daniel Lange and Felix Domke gave a detailed look into the Volkswagen emissions scandal—from the technical side.
...
He was puzzled about how the standard model [aka the one that actually controls emissions] was ever chosen, though, based on his earlier investigation. So he dug back in and found another set of criteria that is used in the model selection. These "unlock conditions" would force the ECU to use the standard model under a fairly odd set of conditions. The engine must be at 15°C or more and it must be running where the atmospheric pressure is more than that at 750m. But, most strangely, the driving profile must also fit within a set of seven linear "curves" that were defined in terms of minimums and maximums of distance-driven versus time-since-motor start.
I read the article and slides last night; it's the best explanation of what was going on that I've seen. One of the curves mentioned above is a perfect fit to the EU emissions test; I assume the other 6 correspond to other emissions testing regimes; but whose they are wasn't IDed in the presentation.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
A bit to technical for me but shouldn't the link say LWN writes instead of LWN wrotes? Just being a little anal today.
|
|
|
|
|
In less than a week Microsoft will formally end support for versions 4.0, 4.5, and 4.5.1 of the .NET Framework. Users should upgrade to a later version such as the slightly incompatible .NET 4.5.2. I'm sure if you submit your bugs now, they'll be fixed in time
|
|
|
|
|
There's support? 
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't .NET Microsoft's way of implementing Write Once Run Everywhere? I guess they forgot the word Hopefully somewhere then...
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
I thought they ended support shortly after releasing those versions, which begs the question - why wasn't 4.5.2 on that list?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
From the horses mouth (or something attached to that bit of plumbing anyway)[^]
Quote: .NET Framework is a component of the Windows OS. Support for .NET 4.5.2 follows the support lifecycle policy of the operating system it is installed on.
Since MS's documentation generally leaves something to be desired, looking in wikipedia[^], the framework versions tied to OS releases (and blessed with long support as a result) are 3.5 (Win7, 8, 10), 4.5.x (win 8) and 4.6.x (win10). The only anomaly I see is that either 3.0 should still be supported for one more year because of Vista, or 4.5.x should've been deprecated since 4.6 is an in place replacement for 4.5. I suppose the larger number of breaking changes between 4.5 and 4.6 vs 3.0 to 3.5 (IIRC 3.5 just added a bunch of new APIs) could be the explanation. OTOH Changing support policies over the years could be a factor as well.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
My point was that after each release, they end support of that release because they're working on a new version.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't mean they won't release patches and bugfixes through Windows Update until the OS's expiration date.
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Let’s assume that we’ve solved the problems of sensors and muscles and all the rest, and accept that the uploaded brain won’t truly reflect our mind. "The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents."
|
|
|
|
|
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo! have all said the UK government's surveillance plans could have "far reaching implications" around the world and parts of it are a "step in the wrong direction." I'm so glad these companies are standing up against invasion of privacy and monitoring
Anyone seen my eyes? They've rolled too far away.
|
|
|
|
|
I was reading about this just this morning, and agree that it's a good thing that such large companies are taking a stand. The government may think they can walk all over average Joe, but they may think twice about trying to walk all over these companies.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: The government may think they can walk all over average Joe
No that is the domain of the said big companies who are probably pissed that the Govt is horning in on their territory.
If you think this is altruistic on the part of these companies I have a great piece of land for sale just west of Alice Springs.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I'll swap it for London Bridge 
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought the yanks already got that one!!!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what point what you thought I was making, and no idea why you'r trying to sell me some land in Alice Springs.
My point was.......the government may not listen to what the average citizen has to say on matters of privacy, but they may be forced to listen to what large corporations have to say on privacy.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
My point is that the large corporation are not doing it to benefit the average Joe, they are defending territory that they already have staked out.
The land is an excellent opportunity, warm all year round, no flooding, plenty of privacy, a bargain!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: The land is an excellent opportunity, warm all year round, no flooding, plenty of privacy, a bargain!
Isn't the land west of Alice Springs part of a national park?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Isn't the land west of Alice Springs part of a national park
Of course, that is what guarantees your privacy and security as you will have NP rangers looking out for your property.
Alternatively we have a lovely lake front[^] block available
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
