|
Hi Chris,
thanks for your clarification and sorry again for the late reply ... I simply missed the reply notification. I understand the motivation, didn't know that using MIT license caused problems on the developer side, could only imagine that someone published code which he hadn't complete control over licensing. But as we developers know it gets sometimes ridiculous for simple solutions when legal comes into play. I think because we're still more hardware oriented our legal team is very careful here...
|
|
|
|
|
The following has been resubmitted as an Article:
JHelpers 6 - A Good and Faithful Servant[^]
A couple of reviewers have approved it, so it will likely get published soon enough if left alone. However, half a dozen reviewers flagged it for being the wrong type. As it discusses a GitHub repository developed by the author, my guess is that it should be published as a Project rather than an Article. If that is so, one of us should add a comment to that effect. I would have done it but am unclear as to the policy on this. And I think converting it to a Project effectively means republishing its GitHub README. Another option would be to change it to a Reference, which is one choice in the article editor's drop-down menu, along with Tip/Trick. But I've never seen a Reference, so I don't know if that is an acceptable alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
I've spoken with the author and asked for improvements on the article before it goes live. He is recovering from Covid so he's going to do it as soon as he can.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like some troll is continuously adding new solutions and then delete it. Is it a reputation hunter ?
Question is from 2021.
I need to use different font weight on items of a datagridcombobox WPF[^]
2 days ago I saw a solution 25, and now it is solution 30 from Graeme_Grant.
Is there a way to see those deleted solutions to identify the troll ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
The question keeps popping on top of Q&A forum with no apparent change.
As the only solution from august is number 30, I suspect a reputation point hunter is continuously adding and rgen deleting new solutions.
Can someone check the reason of such behavior ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
This blog is from PVS-Studio. It's a good static analysis tool with a free trial, but I don't know what the policy is on this kind of thing. If it's acceptable, it has some formatting issues.
- CodeProject[^]
It's gone now. I guess it's not acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
I held off on this article, which got published anyway. Now it's been revised, and I still don't know whether to approve it:
LXUI.NET - Compact Cross-Platform GUI Framework - Part 2[^]
It is a framework with no download, and the GitHub repository only contains tests. I thought I found a DLL when I was looking at it the last time, but no source code. I don't know if the code is private or commercial, but someone else should look into this.
|
|
|
|
|
I've previously emailed him about hosting the full source. Now I remove the article until the source arrives.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Many of these have since been deleted. If you see anything else of this nature please feel free to flag it as unclear or incomplete or extremely poor quality.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback! Will do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Richard MacCutchan replied to my question in the forum C/C++ MFC question "Re: Can GDI and RichEdit share the WindowClient (and live together)"
I got the notification via e-mail however the reply wasn't on the message board at least I didnt see it when going there
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed a lot of really poor QA questions recently which have been up-voted by a low to medium rep user.
The latest example is: How do I solve this problem in C[^]
I don't know how easy it is to check who's up-voting this dross, to see if there's anything suspicious going on?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the catch! The local copy of the source code has been added.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome catch. Thank you very much!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
For example Serializing MailMessage with MimeKit - Introduction[^] is saying Quote: This is an old version of the currently published project. Are they really trying to rollback - if so should this be moderated or is there an actual problem with the site?
Will cross post reference only into Bugs & Sugs
|
|
|
|
|
Member 14953681 above 200 answers in 2 questions !
visual basic[^]
Visual Basic[^]
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I read:
Quote: Project definition: A Project is a code repository imported from a service such as GitHub, BitBucket or Visual Studio online. The repository must have a README file for it to be considered for import, and must adhere to the usual editorial guidelines for articles.
But I see following projects already published (and have come across similar few more in edit/approve queue). Either I am missing something on why they are approved or some how they sneaked in.
SDL
EDT Text Editor
SMU
Help me close the gap here.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently these are closed. Looking at their revision history I'm not sure they were ever live, but may not have been displaying properly as closed?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday it was in queue and they were revised version of already published projects. Thus the query and confusion.
Again, this was not first time. I will share once I see something similar again. Thanks Sean.
|
|
|
|
|
A new one in queue for approval that is already published: - CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
The Project was Closed, but I've taken it a step further and deleted it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|