|
|
Member account was closed and article on 12 so I've deleted it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Persistent little b******, isn't he?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ho! Hi ho! A kicking we will go!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the messages are fine. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, we're feeding him input but his neural net couldn't yet identify the desired pattern. There's probably some hidden bias neuron screwing things up.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
In fact, the more I look through I don't see any issues. Which ones do you have problems with?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefèvre wrote: message got removed already but it's quoted here: Re: Non-Transitive Existence: A Lesson in Faith - CodeProject[^]
What?!!!  
Quote: Many people turn to atheism to escape their responsibility for sin including homosexuality and other perversions
That's the quote you think justifies kicking him off the site? Surely that can't be right.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Soapbox or not, it's offensive. He didn't even care to put it in a way that makes clear that it's his personal opinion.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if it offends you, mark the post as offensive. Not the entire user. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I did because it didn't offend me personally. But I could relate to someone else being offended by it and thus wouldn't object against kicking him for it, which is why I rather support this report here.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefèvre wrote: it's offensive
To me it's funny that someone believes that. He's probably just as offended by the anti-religious posts which are much more prevalent.
Sascha Lefèvre wrote: He didn't even care to put it in a way that makes clear that it's his personal opinion.
He wrote it, I can't see how you could interpret in any other way than his personal opinion?
|
|
|
|
|
PompeyThree wrote: To me it's funny that someone believes that.
Cultural thing, maybe.
PompeyThree wrote: He wrote it, I can't see how you could interpret in any other way than his personal opinion?
You can put statements as being generally valid or mark them as your personal opinion.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefèvre wrote: it's his personal opinion
Perhaps, to him, it isn't.
It's not usually someone's opinion that you'll go to hell.
It's a fact stated in a holy book which dictates the word of an all-knowing entity.
And the fact is that homosexuals go to hell.
I don't see it as an opinion either, I see it as idiocy 
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, there's probably a good chance you're right. Fine by me, the result's the same 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
That's the message which is still there. His previous message was pure, unprovoked abuse.
This follows the standard pattern of our resident troll - post a few reasonable messages, and then start posting religion (which would be fine in SB), homophobic remarks (which he could also just about get away with), and abuse (which is not acceptable).
Why do you always feel the need to defend the nutters? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: His previous message was pure, unprovoked abuse.
Pretty sure I saw all his messages and none were very bad at all.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
So you don't think suggesting that someone likes sucking dick, just because they politely disagree with your religious zealotry, is abusive?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: So you don't think suggesting that someone likes sucking dick, just because they politely disagree with your religious zealotry, is abusive?
I didn't see that message, or I did and didn't interpret it the way you are suggesting. However, I did see a reply that was much worse. I wonder why no one reported that member in here.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
The way I see it he reacted badly to something that was said to him in the Lounge (think it was Griff) in one of his previous lives. Since then he hasn't really reacted even when worse stuff has been said to him (MM) I'm guessing he is Indian from some of his past usernames. Some Indians struggle with the Lounge and it's 'western' banter, first of all - hence one of the reasons GIT was set-up.
His persistance shows that he obviously wants to be a part of the community, and is learning albeit slowly. I suggest we don't report until he does actually do something 'trollish'
|
|
|
|
|
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
