|
Delivered a round of kicks.
Hamsters, could you please contact the website and threaten them with fire and brimstone (at the very least) if their peon keeps this up.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
That guy...It's like playing whac-a-mole.
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
This one[^] spamming here[^] One kick delivered, more please.
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it was you deleted the messages, please don't do it so quickly. Leave them there for enough members to report the USER so the account is nuked. Once the account is gone, feel free to delete messages.
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK. No problem.
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, that was my fault. I hadn't checked here to see if the user had been reported before nuking the question. I also wasn't convinced that the question was meant as spam, or out of ignorance and an attempt to see how the interface works the OP submitted the gibberish questions.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm half with you, but I didn't see a link out to his grid.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Nor did I - so I Googled Dapfor: http://www.dapfor.com/en[^]
If you have to pay for the product, it's an advert!
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know who and why is downvoting my messages. I've got -120 negative points because of nothing since 1 week ago!!
1. Who is looking after this things here? How can I report it?
2. please do something that we will be able to monitor our voters.
Thanks in advanced
If we don't know that we don't know, we'll stay double ignorant for ever.
modified 4-Jun-12 11:49am.
|
|
|
|
|
Shahin Khorshidnia wrote: we will be able to monitor our voters
Like yeah!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
What Manfred? Was it a good suggestion?
If we don't know that we don't know, we'll stay double ignorant for ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Shahin Khorshidnia wrote: Was it a good suggestion?
I'm convinced that this system should not be implemented. It might be implementable, but not with the way the reputation system is currently setup.
Cheers!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Manfred. What's your idea about my problem? Someone is downvoting me and I don't know why?! I can guess who is behind of this but it's just a guess. If nobody stop the guy I will be under water as a debator!
Do you have any idea?
If we don't know that we don't know, we'll stay double ignorant for ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Shahin Khorshidnia wrote: Do you have any idea?
No, I don't have any idea how this could be over come. As I already stated I do feel though that your idea cannot be implemented without some drastic changes to the voting system as currently implemented. Let me go into some detail here:
Right after the principle introduced in the modern fable Animal Farm: "Four legs good ,two legs bad ..." are not all animals CP members equal. Some members are "more equal" than others, meaning to say that the impact of a vote a member with a high reputation in a certain category casts is greater than the impact of the vote of a member with a low reputation in that same category. Only in a group or society where everybody has the same power is anonymous voting obsolete. The anonymity protects the weak.
That is one of the reasons why casting ones vote in an election is an anonymous process.
One final idea though I'm sure it will not be well received:
So when power comes with responsibilty so why not also do we have to be held accountable for our actions.
Meaning: When somebody with a high impact votes, the identity will be revealed to the receiver of said vote and a reason for the vote will have to be given analogous to what is already implemented in the article section.
Cheers!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Manfred. you're right. I've changed my mind about my suggestion. But I don't know the downvoter and I can't report him/her but I think the admin knows him/her and is able to consider it.
( And also I love Animal Farm Book )
If we don't know that we don't know, we'll stay double ignorant for ever.
|
|
|
|